This article is acommentary piece published on the website Wuyouxizhixiang (literally Land of No Use) which is a website known for its leftist and pro-Maoist views. The article criticizes the current state of education in China, arguing that it has deviated from the educational principles of Mao Zedong and hascreated a generation of useless graduates.
Here is a breakdown of the key information and arguments presented in the article:
Author: The author isidentified as Tianmou and is likely a pseudonym.
Main Argument: The article argues that the current education system in China, influenced by Western ideas, has produced a generation of graduates who are useless because they lackpractical skills, a sense of social responsibility, and a commitment to serving the people. The author blames this on the abandonment of Mao Zedong’s educational principles, which emphasized the importance of labor, serving the people, and integrating education withpractical work.
Key Points:
- Criticism of Li Yang: The article begins by criticizing Li Yang, the founder of Crazy English, for his statement that the 10 million graduates this year are useless. While the author acknowledges the validity of Li Yang’s criticism of the education system, hebelieves that the blame lies with the system itself, not the students.
- Expansion of Higher Education: The author criticizes the expansion of higher education in China, arguing that it has led to the creation of a system that prioritizes academic credentials over practical skills and real-world experience.
- Mao Zedong’s Educational Principles: The author extols the virtues of Mao Zedong’s educational principles, which emphasized the integration of education with labor, serving the people, and promoting a sense of social responsibility.
- The Five-Seven Directive: The author cites Mao Zedong’s Five-Seven Directive, which called for students to learn not only academics but also practical skills like farming, industry, and military training. He argues that this directive was crucial in preventing the rise of bourgeois ideology and ensuring the continued success of the socialist revolution.
- The Zero Point Five Incident: The author recounts hisown experience as a student during the period of the Cultural Revolution, when he exposed corruption in the arts admissions process. He argues that this incident highlights the importance of Mao Zedong’s educational principles and the dangers of abandoning them.
- The Restoration of the College Entrance Examination: The author criticizes the restoration of thecollege entrance examination in 1977, arguing that it led to a return to an education system that prioritizes academic credentials over practical skills and social responsibility.
- The Current State of Education: The author argues that the current education system has created a generation of graduates who are ill-prepared for the real world andwho are more likely to become social problems rather than productive members of society.
- Call for a Return to Mao Zedong’s Principles: The author calls for a return to Mao Zedong’s educational principles, arguing that this is the only way to create a truly socialist education system that serves the needs of the people.
Conclusion: The article concludes by expressing hope that the current education reforms will lead to a return to Mao Zedong’s educational principles. The author believes that this is essential for the future of China and for the success of the socialist revolution.
Overall Tone: The article is written in a highly critical andpolemical tone. The author uses strong language to condemn the current education system and to praise Mao Zedong’s educational principles.
Target Audience: The article is likely aimed at readers who are sympathetic to the author’s leftist and pro-Maoist views. It is unlikely to be well-received by those who arecritical of Mao Zedong or who believe that the current education system is on the right track.
Note: It is important to note that this article represents a specific perspective and should be read within the context of the author’s political beliefs and the broader political discourse in China.
Views: 0