shanghaishanghai

As a professional journalist and editor, here is the information you might need to cover the essay Governing for the planet by Jonathan S Blake and Nils Gilman, particularly focusing on the issues surrounding the need for a new approach to politics in addressing planetary problems:

Title: Governing for the Planet: Why Planetary Problems Need a New Approach to Politics

Authors: Jonathan S Blake & Nils Gilman

Context: The essay discusses the limitations of nation-states in addressing global challenges such as pandemics, climate change, and biodiversity loss. It argues that the current political systems are no longer adequate for creating a habitable future for both humans and nature.

Key Points:

  1. The Pandemic Treaty Failure: The essay highlights the failure of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body to meet the deadline for a pandemic treaty, which was supposed to be ready for approval by the 77th World Health Assembly in May 2024. This failure underscores the challenges in achieving global consensus on critical issues.

  2. The Global South’s Concerns: The authors point out that the Global South is concerned about equitable access to tests, vaccines, and therapeutics developed from the information and samples they provide. This issue is a sticking point in the draft treaty’s Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System.

  3. The Need for a New Approach: The essay argues that nation-states, designed for a different era, are ill-equipped to handle modern planetary problems. The authors suggest that a new political system is needed, one that can transcend national boundaries and address global challenges effectively.

  4. Planetary Thinking: The authors propose the concept of planetary thinking, which involves recognizing the interconnectedness of global issues and the need for collective action. This approach would require a rethinking of traditional political structures and the creation of new ones that can operate at a global scale.

  5. The Role of International Institutions: The essay likely discusses the role of international institutions in fostering this new approach to governance. It may also critique the current limitations of these institutions and suggest reforms or new models for global governance.

  6. The Importance of Equity and Justice: The authors emphasize the importance of ensuring that any new global governance system addresses issues of equity and justice, particularly in the context of the Global South’s concerns about access to resources and technologies.

Potential Questions for Further Reporting:

  • What specific reforms or new institutions do the authors propose to address planetary problems?
  • How can the international community overcome the sticking points in negotiations like the pandemic treaty?
  • What role can non-state actors, such as NGOs and corporations, play in this new approach to global governance?
  • How does the concept of planetary thinking differ from traditional nationalistic or statist approaches to governance?

Additional Resources:

  • The essay itself, for in-depth analysis and quotes.
  • Official statements and documents from the World Health Assembly and the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body.
  • Interviews with experts on global governance and international relations.
  • Reports from think tanks and research institutions on the future of global governance.

By exploring these points and questions, you can provide a comprehensive and nuanced report on the essay’s arguments and the broader implications of the need for a new approach to politics in governing for the planet.


>>> Read more <<<

Views: 0

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注