Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

0

Google Faces Antitrust Charges in UK for Adtech Self-Preferencing: ANews Report

London, UK – Google is facing fresh antitrust scrutiny inthe UK, with the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) issuing provisional charges against the tech giant for allegedly abusing its dominant position in the adtech market.

The CMA alleges that Google has been engaging in self-preferencing practices, favoring its own ad exchange (AdX) over competitors and potentially harmingthousands of UK publishers and advertisers.

The watchdog’s investigation, which began in May 2022, focuses on Google’s role in the adtech stack, a complex system that connects advertisers with publishers through real-time bidding for ad space. Google holds a dominant position in this market, controlling key parts of the adtech chain, including ad buying tools, publisher ad servers, and the AdX exchange.

The CMA’s provisional findings accuse Googleof manipulating the system to give AdX an unfair advantage, potentially harming competition and limiting choices for publishers and advertisers. Specific practices cited include:

  • Preferential access for AdX: Google allegedly provides exclusive or preferential access to advertisers using its Google Ads platform, giving AdX an edge over rival exchanges.
    *Bid manipulation: Google is accused of manipulating advertiser bids, making them appear more valuable in AdX auctions compared to auctions on rival platforms.
  • Right of first refusal for AdX: Google’s DFP (DoubleClick For Publishers) ad server allegedly allows AdX to bid first in auctions for adspace, effectively giving it a right of first refusal and potentially excluding competitors from bidding.

The CMA’s investigation highlights concerns that Google’s practices may have stifled competition and limited choices for publishers and advertisers, potentially leading to higher prices and reduced innovation in the adtech market.

Google has the opportunityto respond to the CMA’s provisional findings before a final decision is reached. If found guilty of violating UK competition law, Google could face corrective orders and fines of up to 10% of its annual worldwide group turnover.

This case is likely to be closely watched by regulators and industry players globally, asit could set a precedent for how dominant tech companies are held accountable for their practices in the digital advertising market.


>>> Read more <<<

Views: 0

0

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注