Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

黄山的油菜花黄山的油菜花
0

台北讯 —— 台湾高等法院今日(2024年9月4日)撤销台北地方法院的裁定,对前台北市长、民众党主席柯文哲涉及的京华城弊案重新进行裁定。此案源于柯文哲在台北市长任内被指控涉嫌台北市京华城容积率弊案,台北地检署向法院申请羁押禁见,但台北地方法院裁定当庭无保请回。

案件背景与法院裁定 —— 检方认为柯文哲涉及“贪污治罪条例”中的“违背职务受贿”、“图利”等重罪,且有勾串共犯、证人之虞,向法院申请羁押禁见。然而,台北地方法院裁定柯文哲无保请回,理由是检方指控的重罪“犯罪嫌疑不足”。

高等法院裁定 —— 台湾高等法院在审理后认为,北院裁定针对部分理由调查不足,因此撤销原裁定,并发回台北地方法院重新裁定。这表明高等法院认为北院在处理此案时存在需要补充调查的事项。

柯文哲的回应 —— 柯文哲在被释放后发表声明,对司法单位的行动表示不满,声称司法单位在清晨以搜查的方式搜索他的住处、办公室以及民众党党部,特别是中央党部,质疑这些行动的目的。他声称在最后答辩时,他向法官解释了自己对于京华城容积率840%的问题,并表示作为市长,他不应过问单个案件。

后续发展 —— 台北地检署针对柯文哲无保请回的裁定向法院提出抗告,并紧急备妥卷证送交北院转台湾高等法院审理。高等法院的裁定意味着此案将回到台北地方法院进行进一步的调查和审理。

结语

此案的最新发展再次凸显了台湾司法系统内复杂的政治考量与法律程序的交织。柯文哲作为台湾政坛的重要人物,其涉及的案件不仅关系到个人的法律地位,也引发了广泛的社会关注和政治讨论。高等法院的发回重新裁定,意味着此案将有更多时间进行深入的调查,以期在法律框架内得出公正的结论。


read more

Views: 0

0

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注