Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

0

In a significant ruling, Brazil’s Supreme Court (STF) panel has maintained a previous decision to suspend the former Twitter service, X, across the country. The decision was upheld by a five-judge panel, who voted to restrict access to the platform following a court order issued by Judge Alexandre de Moraes. This order was in response to the refusal of X’s owner, Elon Musk, to comply with court demands to block certain accounts and appoint a legal representative in the country.

Court Decision and Legal Consequences

Judge Alexandre de Moraes issued the ban in response to Musk’s non-compliance with the court’s directive. Four other judges have supported this decision, with Judge Luis Fux being the only one to express reservations about fining individuals who use Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) to circumvent the ban. Fux believes that only those who publish criminal content, such as expressions of Nazism or fascism, should be fined.

Impact on Users and Platforms

The ruling has sparked a wave of new account creations on alternative platforms, as users in Brazil seek to bypass the ban on X. News outlet Poder360 reported that for respect of the court’s decision, its X account is now managed by a team based in Portugal.

Starlink’s Compliance and Further Court Actions

Meanwhile, Starlink has informed Brazil’s telecommunications regulator, Anatel, that it will not comply with the ban until its assets are unfrozen by the court. Despite this, X remains accessible through Starlink services as of the latest reports. According to The New York Times, Judge Alexandre de Moraes has also prohibited Starlink from conducting business in Brazil, while the court seeks to collect the $3 million fine that X has allegedly failed to pay.

Implementation of the Ban

The court’s order requires internet service providers and app stores to take measures within five days to block domestic users’ access to X, with the deadline set for September 4. This directive underscores the court’s seriousness in enforcing the ban and ensuring compliance from all parties involved.

Conclusion

The ongoing saga of X’s suspension in Brazil highlights the tension between global social media platforms and the legal systems of sovereign nations. With the Supreme Court’s decision and the defiance from Starlink, the implications extend beyond the platform’s presence in the country, potentially setting a precedent for future legal challenges in similar contexts. The enforcement of the ban and the subsequent steps by both the platform and the court will continue to shape the digital landscape in Brazil and beyond.


read more

Views: 0

0

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注