Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

新闻报道新闻报道
0

Plankton’s Diss Track Sparks Controversy: Time and Tide Pulled FromNetEase Cloud Music

BEIJING, CHINA – A recent controversyhas erupted in the Chinese online gaming community after a diss track aimed at the popular otome game Time and Tide was removed from NetEase Cloud Music.The track, titled Diss Track: Time and Tide, was written and performed by Plankton, a well-known music producer and songwriter known for his satiricaland often controversial lyrics.

The song, which quickly gained traction on the platform, featured lyrics critical of Time and Tide’s gameplay, story, and character design. Plankton, known for his sharp wit and comedic timing, used a blend of playful jabs and pointed criticisms to express his dissatisfaction with the game.

However, the song’s popularity was short-lived. Within hours of its release, Diss Track: Time and Tide wastaken down from NetEase Cloud Music, leaving fans and critics alike puzzled.

While the official reason for the song’s removal remains unclear, speculation has run rampant. Some believe the removal was a direct result of pressure from Time and Tide’s developers, MiHoYo, who may have deemed thesong’s content defamatory and harmful to their game’s reputation. Others speculate that NetEase Cloud Music, as a platform hosting both the game and the song, may have opted to remove the track to avoid potential legal issues or public backlash.

The controversy surrounding the song’s removal has sparked a debateabout freedom of expression and censorship in the Chinese online gaming community. Many argue that Plankton’s song, while critical, was ultimately a form of artistic expression and should have been allowed to remain on the platform. They point to the song’s humorous and satirical nature, arguing that it was intended to be a playfulcritique rather than a malicious attack.

Others, however, support the removal of the song, citing the potential for it to damage Time and Tide’s reputation and discourage players from engaging with the game. They argue that while freedom of expression is important, it must be balanced with the need to protect businesses andintellectual property.

The controversy has also highlighted the complex relationship between online gaming platforms and content creators in China. While platforms like NetEase Cloud Music are often seen as havens for creative expression, they also face pressure to maintain a certain level of control over the content hosted on their platforms. This pressure often stems from acombination of government regulations, corporate interests, and public opinion.

The removal of Plankton’s diss track serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between freedom of expression and the need to protect businesses and intellectual property in the Chinese online gaming community. As the debate surrounding the song’s removal continues, it remains tobe seen whether this incident will lead to greater transparency and dialogue between content creators, platforms, and game developers.

Further Developments:

  • MiHoYo’s Response: MiHoYo has yet to publicly comment on the removal of the song.
  • NetEase Cloud Music’s Response: NetEase Cloud Music has also remained silent on the matter.
  • Plankton’s Response: Plankton has expressed his disappointment over the song’s removal, stating that he believes his work was intended to be a humorous critique and not a malicious attack. He has also hinted at the possibility of releasingthe song on other platforms.

This incident serves as a reminder of the complex and evolving landscape of online gaming in China, where freedom of expression, corporate interests, and government regulations often collide.


read more

Views: 0

0

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注