防弹成员诉“脱粉收容所”博主侵权案开庭审理，双方各执一词
韩国男团防弹少年团（BTS）成员V、柾国以及所属经纪公司BIGHIT MUSIC，于8月23日在首尔西部地方法院针对优兔频道“脱粉收容所”博主朴某提起的损害赔偿诉讼案首次开庭审理。
据韩联社报道，防弹方面律师表示，朴某制作并发布的视频内容纯属虚假，严重侵犯了原告的人格权，因此提起诉讼，要求追究其法律责任。
而朴某的律师则辩称，虽然承认其上传了相关视频，但强调这些视频属于个人意见表达，并非传播虚假信息损害他人名誉。律师还表示，即使部分内容被认定为虚假信息，但朴某出于维护公共利益制作了这些视频，因此不应承担赔偿责任。
据悉，今年3月，V和柾国等人指控朴某损害个人名誉，并提起诉讼，要求其赔偿9000万韩元（约合人民币48万元）。朴某曾制作多条以艺人传闻为题材的视频，并将其上传至其运营的“脱粉收容所”频道。该频道现已被删除。除了防弹少年团外，朴某还涉嫌损害张员瑛、姜丹尼尔等多名艺人的名誉，目前正被多起官司缠身。
此次庭审中，双方律师围绕视频内容是否属实、是否构成侵权等问题进行了激烈的辩论。法官将在审理完所有证据后，择期宣判。
这场诉讼案引发了韩国娱乐圈对网络侵权问题的关注。近年来，随着社交媒体的普及，网络暴力和名誉侵权事件频发，给艺人和公众人物带来了巨大的困扰。此次案件的审理结果，将对未来类似案件的处理提供参考，也提醒公众在网络言论自由与个人隐私保护之间寻求平衡。
英语如下：
BTS Members Sue YouTuber for Defamation, First Hearing Held
Keywords: BTSlawsuit, court hearing, defamatory YouTuber
Content:
The firsthearing for the damage compensation lawsuit filed by V and Jungkook, members of the South Korean boy band BTS, and their agency BIGHIT MUSIC against YouTuber Park,who runs the channel “脱粉收容所” (literally “Fan Detachment Shelter”), was held on August 23rd at the Seoul Western DistrictCourt.
According to Yonhap News Agency, BTS’s lawyers argued that the videos produced and uploaded by Park were entirely false and severely violated the plaintiffs’ personal rights, thus prompting the lawsuit to hold Park legally accountable.
Park’s lawyer, however, countered that while acknowledging the uploaded videos, they were expressions of personal opinions and not intended to spread false information to damage others’ reputations. The lawyer further argued that even if some content was deemed false, Park created thesevideos to uphold public interest and therefore shouldn’t be held liable for compensation.
It is reported that in March, V, Jungkook, and others accused Park of damaging their reputations and filed a lawsuit demanding 90 million won (approximately 480,000 yuan) in compensation. Park had producednumerous videos based on rumors about celebrities and uploaded them to their “Fan Detachment Shelter” channel, which has since been deleted. Besides BTS, Park is also accused of damaging the reputations of other celebrities such as Jang Wonyoung and Kang Daniel, and is currently entangled in multiple lawsuits.
During the hearing, bothsides’ lawyers engaged in heated debate regarding the truthfulness of the video content and whether it constituted defamation. The judge will make a decision after reviewing all evidence.
This lawsuit has sparked attention in the Korean entertainment industry regarding online defamation. In recent years, with the rise of social media, online violence and defamation have becomeincreasingly common, causing significant distress to celebrities and public figures. The outcome of this case will serve as a reference for handling similar cases in the future and also remind the public to seek a balance between freedom of speech online and the protection of personal privacy.
【来源】https://cn.yna.co.kr/view/ACK20240823002300881?section=society/index&input=rss
Views: 1