防弹少年团成员V、柾国起诉“脱粉收容所”博主案开庭：名誉权之争引关注
韩国男团防弹少年团（BTS）成员V、柾国以及所属经纪公司BIGHIT MUSIC，于8月23日在首尔西部地方法院对优兔频道“脱粉收容所”博主朴某提起的名誉权侵犯诉讼案进行了首次开庭审理。此案引发了广泛关注，不仅是粉丝群体，也引起了韩国社会对网络言论自由和名誉权保护的讨论。
据悉，朴某运营的“脱粉收容所”频道曾发布多条以艺人传闻为题材的视频，其中涉及V、柾国等多位防弹少年团成员。原告方认为，朴某发布的视频内容纯属虚假，严重损害了他们的名誉和人格权，因此提起诉讼，要求朴某赔偿9000万韩元（约合人民币48万元）。
被告方则辩称，朴某上传的视频属于发表个人意见，并非传播虚假信息损害他人名誉。他们认为，即使视频内容存在部分虚假信息，但朴某出于维护公共利益制作了这些视频，因此不应承担赔偿责任。
此次开庭审理中，双方律师围绕视频内容的真实性、发布目的以及是否构成名誉侵犯等问题进行了激烈的辩论。最终，法官宣布休庭，择日宣判。
该案件的审理结果将对韩国网络言论自由和名誉权保护产生重要影响。一方面，网络平台的快速发展为言论表达提供了更多空间，但同时也带来了信息真伪难辨、恶意诽谤等问题。另一方面，公众人物的名誉权也需要得到有效保护，避免其遭受不实信息的伤害。
此次案件也引发了粉丝群体对偶像名誉权保护的关注。粉丝们纷纷表示，希望通过法律途径维护偶像的合法权益，同时呼吁网络平台加强对虚假信息的监管，营造更加健康有序的网络环境。
最终，法院的判决结果将对网络言论自由和名誉权保护的平衡起到重要的示范作用。
英语如下：
BTS Members V and Jungkook Sue YouTuber for Defamation: Trial Begins
Keywords: BTS lawsuit, court hearing, defamatory YouTuber
Content:
V and Jungkook, members of the South Korean boy band BTS, along with their agency BIGHIT MUSIC, held the first court hearing on August 23rd at the Seoul Western District Court against YouTuber Park, the operator of the channel “脱粉收容所” (roughly translated as “Fan DetachmentShelter”). The lawsuit, alleging defamation, has garnered significant attention, sparking discussions on online freedom of speech and the protection of reputation within Korean society.
Park’s channel has been known for posting videos based on rumors about celebrities, including V, Jungkook, and other BTS members. The plaintiffs argue that Park’s videos are entirely fabricated and have severely damaged their reputation and personal rights, demanding 90 million won (approximately 480,000 yuan) incompensation.
The defendant claims that Park’s videos are expressions of personal opinions and not intended to spread false information to harm others’ reputations. They argue that even if the videos contain some inaccuracies, Park created them to uphold public interest and should not be held liable for compensation.
During the hearing, lawyers from bothsides engaged in heated debates regarding the authenticity of the video content, its purpose, and whether it constitutes defamation. The judge ultimately adjourned the trial, reserving the verdict for a later date.
The outcome of this case will have significant implications for online freedom of speech and reputation protection in South Korea. On one hand, therapid development of online platforms has provided more space for freedom of expression, but it has also led to issues of information authenticity and malicious defamation. On the other hand, the reputations of public figures need effective protection to prevent them from being harmed by false information.
This case has also drawn attention from fans regarding the protection oftheir idols’ reputations. Fans have expressed their desire to uphold their idols’ legal rights through legal means, while calling for online platforms to strengthen their regulation of false information and create a healthier and more orderly online environment.
Ultimately, the court’s verdict will serve as a crucial precedent for balancing online freedom of speech andreputation protection.
【来源】https://cn.yna.co.kr/view/ACK20240823002300881?section=culture-sports/index&input=rss
Views: 1