近日，一所知名大学的两名研究生因在午休时间使用工作电脑打游戏被学校重罚，不仅需完成双倍毕业成果才能进行答辩，其导师也因此受到罚款。这一处理方式引起了社会的广泛讨论，关于学校处理是否合理的问题也随之而来。
根据学校的规定，学生在使用学校资源时应当遵守相关规定，不得用于与学习无关的活动。两名研究生在午休时间打游戏的行为显然违反了这一规定。学校对这种行为进行惩罚，体现了其对规则的尊重和对学生行为的严格要求。
然而，对于惩罚措施是否适当，社会各界持有不同意见。一方面，有人认为学校对学生的惩罚过于严厉，尤其是要求学生完成双倍毕业成果，可能会给学生带来过大的压力，影响其正常的学习和心理健康。另一方面，也有人支持学校的做法，认为这种严厉的惩罚可以起到警示作用，防止其他学生效仿。
此外，对于导师的罚款，有人认为这是对导师未能有效管理学生的惩罚，有助于提升导师的责任感。然而，也有观点认为，导师的罚款可能并非其直接责任，因此这种惩罚方式可能不够公平。
综上所述，学校对两名研究生和其导师的处理方式在社会上引起了广泛的讨论。虽然学校有责任维护规章制度，但在执行惩罚时也应考虑到学生的实际情况和心理承受能力，以确保教育措施的合理性和有效性。对于此类事件的处理，需要学校、学生和家长等多方面的沟通和理解，共同寻求一个既能维护学校规则，又能保护学生权益的解决方案。
英语如下：
Title: “Heavy Penalties for Gaming by Graduate Students Spark Controversy: Is It Fair for Schools to Fine Advisors?”
Keywords: Gaming Punishment, Graduation Requirements, Advisor Responsibility
News Content:
Recently, two graduate students from a prestigious university were severely punished by the school for playing games on work computers during lunch breaks. They were required to complete double the graduation requirements before they could defend their theses, and their advisors were fined as well. This disciplinary action has sparked widespread debate and raised questions about the fairness of the school’s handling of the situation.
According to the university’s regulations, students are required to abide by the rules when using school resources and are prohibited from using them for activities unrelated to their studies. The two students’ behavior of playing games during lunch breaks clearly violated this rule. The school’s punishment of this behavior demonstrates its respect for rules and strictness in student conduct.
However, there is a variety of opinions on whether the punishment measures are appropriate. On one hand, some argue that the punishment is too severe for the students, especially the requirement to complete double the graduation requirements, which could place an excessive amount of pressure on them and potentially affect their normal academic performance and mental health. On the other hand, there are those who support the school’s approach, believing that such harsh penalties can serve as a deterrent to prevent other students from following suit.
Moreover, there are differing views on the issue of fining advisors. Some see this as a punishment for advisors who have failed to effectively manage their students, which could help increase the sense of responsibility among advisors. However, there are also opinions that the fines for advisors may not be directly their responsibility, making this form of punishment potentially unfair.
In summary, the school’s handling of the situation with the two graduate students and their advisors has sparked a wide-ranging debate. While the school has a responsibility to uphold its rules, it should also consider the students’ actual circumstances and psychological endurance when implementing penalties, to ensure the rationality and effectiveness of its educational measures. The resolution to such incidents requires communication and understanding among the school, students, and parents, to seek a solution that can maintain the school’s rules while protecting the students’ rights.
【来源】https://www.zhihu.com/question/663791142
Views: 7