谷歌工程师批评OpenAI阻碍通用人工智能研究进展
据最新报道，一位谷歌软件工程师对OpenAI在人工智能领域的研究方法和成果表示强烈批评，认为其延缓了通用人工智能（AGI）的进步。此事引发了业界人士的广泛关注和热议。
TradingView发布的信息显示，谷歌软件工程师弗朗索瓦·肖莱在一次播客节目中表达了他对AGI研究现状的担忧。他指出，当前AGI研究的开放性和共享程度远不如前，前沿研究成果不再像过去那样广泛公开分享和发表。肖莱将这一变化归咎于OpenAI，指责其导致了“前沿研究出版的完全关闭”。
对此，业内专家表示不同看法。一些人认同肖莱的观点，认为OpenAI的某些做法确实阻碍了研究的开放性和透明度；另一些人则认为，开源社区和科研机构之间的合作与竞争是推动科技进步的重要因素之一，不应过分指责OpenAI。对此争议，各界人士纷纷表达意见。
值得注意的是，此次批评事件再次引发了关于开放科学、合作竞争以及知识产权保护等问题的讨论。未来，如何平衡科技进步与开放共享的关系，将是业界需要深入思考的问题。
英语如下：
News Title: Google Engineer Criticizes OpenAI for Hindering AGI Research Progress: Openness of Frontier Research Under Challenge
Keywords: Google Criticizes OpenAI, AGI Research, Frontier Research Controversy
News Content:
Google Engineer Criticizes OpenAI for Impeding Progress in Artificial General Intelligence Research
According to the latest reports, a Google software engineer has strongly criticized OpenAI’s research methods and achievements in the field of artificial intelligence, arguing that it has delayed the progress of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). This has sparked widespread concern and heated debate among industry insiders.
Information published by TradingView shows that Google software engineer François Chollet expressed his concerns about the current state of AGI research during a podcast. He pointed out that the openness and sharing of AGI research are far less than before, and frontier research results are no longer widely shared and published as in the past. Chollet attributed this change to OpenAI, accusing it of causing “complete closure of frontier research publications.”
Industry experts hold different views on this matter. Some agree with Chollet that certain practices by OpenAI have indeed hindered the openness and transparency of research. Others believe that collaboration and competition among open-source communities and scientific research institutions are important factors driving technological progress and should not overly blame OpenAI. People from different sectors have expressed their opinions on this controversy.
It is noteworthy that this criticism has once again sparked discussions on open science, collaboration and competition, as well as intellectual property protection. In the future, how to balance the relationship between technological progress and open sharing will be a profound question that the industry needs to consider.
【来源】https://www.ithome.com/0/774/687.htm
Views: 2