据广西壮族自治区来宾市中级人民法院官方微信公众号消息，2024年5月15日，广西壮族自治区来宾市中级人民法院对上诉人（原审被告人）冯波参加黑社会性质组织、诈骗、帮助伪造证据一案二审依法公开宣判。二审判决部分改判了一审判决结果。
冯波案自一审判决以来，备受社会关注。一审判决认定冯波犯有参加黑社会性质组织、诈骗、帮助伪造证据等多项罪名，对其判处相应的刑罚。然而，冯波不服一审判决，提起上诉。
在二审过程中，来宾市中级人民法院对案件进行了全面审查，针对上诉人的上诉理由和辩护意见，法院依法进行了审理。经审理认为，一审判决在部分事实认定和法律适用上存在瑕疵，因此对一审判决结果进行了部分改判。
改判的具体内容尚未公开，但据透露，二审判决对冯波的部分罪名和刑罚进行了调整。此次二审宣判，体现了法院依法独立行使审判权，严格依法办事的原则，也彰显了法治的公正与公平。
本次冯波案的二审宣判，不仅是对案件本身的公正审理，更是对法治精神的有力维护。法院以实际行动践行了司法公正、维护了社会公平正义，彰显了我国法治建设的成果。
英语如下：
**Headline:** “Part of冯波 Case Upheld on Appeal: Charge of Being a Member of Organized Crime Group Established”
Keywords:冯波 Case, Appeal Verdict, Partial Retrial
**News Content:**
# Appeal Verdict in冯波 Case Announced, Partial Retrial of Initial Judgment
According to the official WeChat public account of the People’s Court of Laibin City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, on May 15, 2024, the Laibin City People’s Court of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region publicly announced the verdict of the second instance in the case of Feng Bo, who was charged with being a member of an organized crime group, fraud, and aiding in the fabrication of evidence. The second-instance judgment partially modified the judgment of the first instance.
Since the first-instance judgment in the Feng Bo case, it has attracted widespread attention from society. The first-instance judgment found Feng Bo guilty of participating in an organized crime group, fraud, and aiding in the fabrication of evidence, and sentenced him to appropriate penalties. However, Feng Bo appealed against the first-instance judgment.
During the second instance trial, the Laibin City People’s Court conducted a comprehensive review of the case. In response to the appellant’s appeal reasons and defense opinions, the court conducted a legal trial. After trial, the court considered that there were defects in the identification of some facts and application of law in the first-instance judgment, and therefore, it partially modified the judgment of the first instance.
The specific content of the modification has not been publicly disclosed, but it is reported that the second-instance judgment adjusted some of Feng Bo’s charges and sentences. This second-instance verdict reflects the court’s independent exercise of judicial power and the principle of strict adherence to law, and it also highlights the justice and fairness of the rule of law.
The second-instance judgment in the Feng Bo case not only ensures the fair trial of the case itself but also effectivelysafeguards the spirit of the rule of law. The court practices judicial fairness and maintains social justice, showcasing the achievements of China’s legal construction.
【来源】http://www.chinanews.com/sh/2024/05-15/10217148.shtml
Views: 1