全球知名图形处理器制造商英伟达近日面临一项版权纠纷。据财联社报道，三位作家Brian Keene、Abdi Nazemian和Stewart O’Nan已正式起诉英伟达，指控该公司在未经许可的情况下，使用他们的版权书籍训练其NeMo人工智能平台。
英伟达的NeMo平台在人工智能领域颇受欢迎，尤其在语音识别和自然语言处理方面表现出色。然而，这起诉讼揭示了一个潜在的问题：在AI训练过程中，对于数据集的版权使用可能存在的法律风险。据三位作者声称，他们的作品被包含在一个包含大约196,640本书的数据集中，这些书籍被用来帮助NeMo模拟和理解书面语言。然而，他们在10月份因涉嫌侵犯版权的问题被从该数据集中移除。
这一事件对英伟达的声誉和业务可能产生影响，尤其是在当前AI技术高度依赖大量数据训练的背景下。尽管英伟达的芯片需求因AI热潮而持续高涨，但此次版权纠纷无疑为其带来了新的挑战。目前，英伟达尚未公开回应此事，但此事无疑将引发业界对AI训练数据合法性的深入讨论。
三位作家的诉讼可能只是冰山一角，随着AI技术的普及，如何在保护知识产权和推动技术创新之间找到平衡，已经成为亟待解决的问题。
英语如下：
News Title: “NVIDIA Sued for Allegedly Misusing Copyrighted Works to Train NeMo AI Platform”
Keywords: NVIDIA, copyright dispute, NeMo platform
News Content:
Title: NVIDIA Faces Copyright Lawsuit Over Alleged Unauthorized Use of Copyrighted Books to Train NeMo AI Platform
Global graphics processing unit manufacturer NVIDIA is currently entangled in a copyright dispute. According to Cailian Press, authors Brian Keene, Abdi Nazemian, and Stewart O’Nan have officially sued the company, accusing it of using their copyrighted books to train its NeMo artificial intelligence platform without permission.
NVIDIA’s NeMo platform is popular in the AI field, particularly for its prowess in speech recognition and natural language processing. However, this lawsuit exposes a potential issue: the legal risks associated with the use of copyrighted material in AI training datasets. The authors claim that their works were part of a dataset comprising approximately 196,640 books, which were utilized to help NeMo simulate and understand written language. They were removed from the dataset in October due to alleged copyright infringement.
This incident could impact NVIDIA’s reputation and business, especially given the high dependence of AI technology on extensive data training. Despite continued demand for its chips driven by the AI boom, this copyright dispute poses a new challenge for the company. NVIDIA has yet to publicly comment on the matter, but it is sure to spark a broader industry discussion about the legality of AI training data.
The lawsuit from the three authors may just be the tip of the iceberg, as finding a balance between protecting intellectual property and fostering technological innovation becomes an increasingly pressing issue with the proliferation of AI technology.
【来源】https://www.cls.cn/detail/1615573
Views: 1