据财联社报道,根据数据分析平台SimilarWeb的最新数据,OpenAI的GPT商店中用户自定义的GPT模型在ChatGPT网站的桌面访问量中仅占据了微小的份额,具体为1.5%。这一比例在2月份保持稳定,显示了此类个性化GPT的流量增长潜力似乎已趋于饱和。

尽管如此,OpenAI的应用商店内仍有部分特定功能的聊天机器人受到了用户的追捧。值得注意的是,一些能够预测股票市场动态以及帮助用户规避抄袭检测的聊天机器人在其中显得尤为热门。这些工具的流行揭示了人工智能在实际应用中的多样化场景,尤其是在教育和金融领域。

值得注意的是,访问量最高的五个GPT模型中有五个特别声称,它们生成的内容能够逃避学术界的检测工具,使得由人工智能创作的论文和答案难以被识别。这表明,生成式人工智能技术可能正在被部分用户用于应对学术诚信的挑战,同时也引发了关于技术使用伦理和教育监管的新讨论。

这些数据为理解数百万人使用生成式人工智能的真实目的提供了窗口,同时也对教育机构和相关监管方提出了新的课题,如何在保持教育公平性的同时,适应并规范这一新兴技术的使用。

英语如下:

News Title: “ChatGPT Traffic Data Analysis: Custom GPT Usage Accounts for Only 1.5%, Cheating Assistance Apps Gain Popularity”

Keywords: ChatGPT traffic, Custom GPT, Plagiarism detection

News Content: According to Caixin Global, based on the latest data from the analytics platform SimilarWeb, user-customized GPT models in OpenAI’s GPT store represent a small fraction, specifically 1.5%, of desktop visits to the ChatGPT website. This percentage remained stable in February, indicating that the growth potential for such personalized GPT traffic may have reached saturation.

Despite this, certain chatbot applications with specific functionalities within the OpenAI app store have seen a surge in user interest. Notably, chatbots that predict stock market movements and assist users in evading plagiarism detection tools have gained significant popularity. The popularity of these tools highlights the diverse applications of artificial intelligence in practical scenarios, particularly in education and finance.

Interestingly, five of the top five most-visited GPT models explicitly claim that their generated content can evade academic detection tools, making AI-created essays and answers difficult to identify. This suggests that generative AI technology might be employed by some users to address challenges to academic integrity, concurrently sparking new discussions on ethical technology usage and educational oversight.

These data provide insight into the real motivations behind the millions using generative AI and pose new challenges for educational institutions and regulators. The task at hand is to maintain fairness in education while adapting to and regulating the use of this emerging technology.

【来源】https://www.cls.cn/detail/1633044

Views: 1

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注