美国众议员 Adam Schiff 近日提出了一项名为《生成式 AI 版权披露法案》的新立法，旨在加强人工智能领域的版权保护。据 Billboard 报道，该法案要求 AI 公司公开其模型在训练过程中使用受版权保护的数据详情，以确保透明度和合规性。如果法案获得通过，未能遵守规定的公司可能会面临经济处罚。
根据法案内容，无论是新开发的生成式 AI 模型还是已经发布的 AI 系统，都将受到此法规的约束。AI 公司需要在向消费者提供模型之前30天内，向美国版权局提交一份详尽的清单，列出训练数据集中包含的所有受版权保护的作品。此外，一旦模型的训练数据集发生重大改变，公司也必须及时更新并向版权局报告。
这一举措反映出立法者对 AI 技术潜在版权侵权问题的关注，旨在维护创作者权益，同时促进 AI 行业的健康发展。法案的出台将为 AI 公司设定明确的法律边界，推动行业在尊重知识产权的基础上进行创新。然而，法案的具体执行和定义“重大改变”的标准仍有待进一步讨论和明确。来源：IT之家。
英语如下：
News Title: “US Lawmaker Proposes Bill: AI Companies Must Disclose Copyrighted Training Data or Face Penalties”
Keywords: AI Bill, Copyright Disclosure, Economic Penalties
News Content: U.S. Representative Adam Schiff recently introduced a new legislative proposal called the “Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act,” aimed at strengthening copyright protection in the field of artificial intelligence. According to Billboard, the bill requires AI companies to disclose details about copyrighted data used in their models’ training processes to ensure transparency and compliance. If passed, companies failing to adhere to the regulations could face economic penalties.
Under the provisions of the bill, both newly developed generative AI models and already released AI systems would be subject to these regulations. AI companies would be required to submit a comprehensive list to the U.S. Copyright Office 30 days prior to providing their models to consumers, detailing all copyrighted works contained within their training datasets. Furthermore, in case of significant changes to the training dataset, the company must promptly update and report these changes to the Copyright Office.
This move reflects lawmakers’ concerns over potential copyright infringement issues with AI technology, intending to protect creators’ rights while fostering the healthy development of the AI industry. The bill sets clear legal boundaries for AI companies, encouraging innovation on the foundation of respecting intellectual property rights. However, the specifics of enforcement and the criteria for defining “significant changes” still require further discussion and clarification. Source: IT Home.
【来源】https://www.ithome.com/0/761/336.htm
Views: 2