据最高检第五检察厅厅长侯亚辉透露,截至2023年11月,全国检察机关受理“减假暂”案件27万余人,提出纠正意见1.6万余件。这一数据反映出我国检察机关在加强对“减假暂”案件的审查和监督方面取得了积极成果。

“减假暂”案件涉及罪犯在刑罚执行过程中的减刑、假释和暂予监外执行等环节,容易滋生司法腐败和“纸面服刑”现象。为此,最高检高度重视此类案件的审查和监督工作,通过加强内部协作和外部协调,确保刑罚执行的公正和公平。

针对“纸面服刑”等问题,检察机关在审查“减假暂”案件时,重点关注案件的事实、证据和法律适用等方面,对不符合法定条件的案件提出纠正意见。同时,检察机关还加强与审判机关、刑罚执行机关等相关部门的沟通协作,共同防范和打击司法腐败现象。

截至2023年11月,全国检察机关提出的纠正意见逾1.6万件,既监督防止了“纸面服刑”“提钱出”等现象,也提升了司法公信力和权威性。这些成果体现了我国检察机关在维护司法公正、保障人民群众合法权益方面的坚定决心和责任担当。

Title: Over 16,000 corrective opinions issued on “sentence reduction, parole, and temporary release” cases

Keywords: Sentence reduction, corrective opinions, judicial corruption

News content:
According to Hou Yahui, Director-General of the Fifth Prosecutorial Division of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, by November 2023, prosecutorial organs across the country had accepted over 270,000 “sentence reduction, parole, and temporary release” cases, issuing approximately 16,000 corrective opinions. This reflects the positive achievements of prosecutorial organs in strengthening the review and supervision of such cases in our country.

“Sentence reduction, parole, and temporary release” cases involve various aspects of criminal punishment execution, including sentence reduction, parole, and temporary release. They are prone to judicial corruption and the phenomenon of “paper imprisonment.” Therefore, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate attaches great importance to the review and supervision of such cases and has achieved positive results.

To address issues related to “paper imprisonment,” prosecutorial organs focus on the review of case facts, evidence, and legal application when examining “sentence reduction, parole, and temporary release” cases. They propose corrective opinions for cases that do not meet legal conditions and strengthen communication and cooperation with relevant departments such as judicial organs and punishment execution agencies to jointly prevent and combat judicial corruption.

By November 2023, prosecutorial organs across the country had issued over 16,000 corrective opinions, effectively supervising and preventing phenomena such as “paper imprisonment” and “release for money.” These achievements enhance the credibility and authority of the judicial system and demonstrate the determination and responsibility of prosecutorial organs in safeguarding judicial justice and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the people.

【来源】http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2024/02-05/10159331.shtml

Views: 1

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注