标题：华中农大教授黄某若回应被举报学术不端：举报全部不实，三天来每日只睡一两小时
华中农业大学近期发生的11名学生联名举报系主任一事持续引发关注。1月18日，当事教授黄某若回复上游新闻记者称，学生举报的内容全部不实。为了准备回复材料，他连续三天每天只睡一两小时，认真阅读了学生写的125页举报材料。
黄教授表示，他对学生的举报感到震惊，并对他们的指控进行了详细的调查。他表示，所有的指控都没有实质性的证据支持，他的学术行为完全符合学校和学术的规定。
黄教授在回复中表示，他将积极配合学校的调查，以证明自己的清白。他还呼吁媒体和公众理性看待此事，不要因为一些未经证实的指控就对他进行人身攻击。
这起事件引发了公众对于学术不端行为的深度关注。对此，专家表示，学术界应该建立更加公正、公平、透明的评价体系，对于任何可能存在的学术不端行为，都应该进行严肃处理，以维护学术界的公正和公信力。
英语如下：
Title: “Huazhong Agricultural University Professor Stays Up All Night Writing Response, Only Sleeps an Hour or Two in Three Days, Stubbornly Claims All Reports of Misconduct are False”
Keywords: Professor Report, Student Misconduct, Late-night Response
Content: Title: Huazhong Agricultural University Professor Huang Mouruo Responds to Being Reported for Academic Misconduct: All Reports Are False, Staying Up for Three Days with Only an Hour or Two of Sleep Each Day
The recent incident at Huazhong Agricultural University involving 11 students who jointly reported their department head has continued to draw attention. On January 18th, the involved professor, Huang Mouruo, responded to a reporter from the upstream news agency, claiming that the contents of the student report were all false. In order to prepare his response material, he stayed up late for three consecutive days, reading through the 125 pages of student reports carefully.
Professor Huang expressed shock at the students’ accusations and conducted a detailed investigation into their allegations. He stated that none of the allegations had substantive evidence to support them and that his academic behavior was fully in line with the school and academic regulations.
In his response, Professor Huang stated that he would actively cooperate with the school’s investigation to prove his innocence. He also called on the media and the public to view this matter rationally and not to attack him personally due to unsubstantiated accusations.
This incident has sparked widespread public concern over academic misconduct. In response, experts suggest that the academic community should establish a more fair, equitable, and transparent evaluation system, and that any possible academic misconduct should be dealt with seriously to maintain the fairness and credibility of the academic community.
【来源】https://www.zhihu.com/question/640101289
Views: 1