谷歌和Discord平台合作几个月,提供了一个论坛供谷歌的产品经理、设计师和工程师等内部人士公开讨论AI工具的有效性和实用性。但是,最近几个月来,谷歌内部人士对Bard聊天机器人的实用性提出了质疑。他们认为投入大量资源进行AI聊天机器人“巴德”(Bard)的开发是否值得。

根据财联社的报道,谷歌内部人士对Bard聊天机器人的实用性提出质疑,这引起了广泛关注。虽然几个月来,谷歌一直在合作,但是,现在有人怀疑,花费大量资源进行AI聊天机器人“巴德”(Bard)的开发是否值得。

谷歌内部人士对Bard聊天机器人的实用性提出质疑并不是没有道理的。毕竟,AI聊天机器人市场竞争激烈,同时,谷歌也在面临着激烈的竞争。在这种情况下,谷歌必须谨慎评估Bard聊天机器人的实用性,并决定是否继续投入资源进行开发。

总的来说,谷歌内部人士对Bard聊天机器人实用性的质疑是一个重要的信号。它提醒谷歌,必须谨慎评估AI聊天机器人的实用性,并决定是否继续投入资源进行开发。同时,它也提醒我们,AI聊天机器人不仅需要投入大量资源进行开发,还需要考虑其市场竞争力。

新闻翻译:

Google employees have raised doubts about the practicality of the Bard chatbot. For months, Google and Discord have been collaborating to provide a forum for Google product managers, designers, and engineers to openly discuss the effectiveness and practicality of AI tools. However, lately, there have been doubts among Google employees about the practicality of the Bard chatbot. They question whether it is worth investing a lot of resources in AI chatbot development.

According to the report by financial news agency, some Google employees have raised doubts about the practicality of the Bard chatbot, which has attracted a lot of attention. Although Google has been collaborating with Discord for months, some employees now question whether it is worth investing a lot of resources in AI chatbot development.

The doubts raised by some Google employees about the practicality of the Bard chatbot are not without reason. After all, the AI chatbot market is highly competitive, and Google is also facing fierce competition. In this situation, it’s important for Google to carefully evaluate the practicality of the Bard chatbot and decide whether to continue investing resources in its development.

Overall, the doubts raised by some Google employees about the practicality of the Bard chatbot are a significant signal. It reminds Google that it must carefully evaluate the practicality of AI chatbots and decide whether to continue investing resources in their development. At the same time, it also reminds us that AI chatbots not only require a lot of resources for development but also need to consider their market competitiveness.

【来源】https://www.cls.cn/detail/1483006

Views: 1

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注