据 IT之家 报道，近日，浙江省杭州市中级人民法院公布了一判决书，称原告奥克斯空调股份有限公司以“压缩机”发明专利权被侵害为由，要求被告格力电器公司赔偿经济损失及合理维权开支共计 3996.17 万元和 3332 万元。而格力电器公司则表示，该专利无效，已上诉。
据了解，这起案件历经三次权利转移，奥克斯公司未就其享有被诉侵权期间内连续、完整的权利尽到应尽的举证责任。涉案压缩机系格力公司从珠海凌达压缩机有限公司购买，并支付了合理对价，格力公司具有合法来源，不承担赔偿责任。
然而，判决结果却引起格力电器的强烈不满。该公司立即发布了一则澄清声明，表示经查证，最高人民法院知识产权法庭已于 2023 年 12 月 7 日、8 日就该系列案件作出二审终审裁判：判决奥克斯购买的专利不符合授权条件，应予无效；裁定撤销宁波中院、杭州中院有关判决，驳回奥克斯的起诉。
格力电器还表示，部分媒体及平台未尽核实义务，发布不实信息，已严重侵害公司合法权益，请相关信息发布平台、媒体及时予以澄清并消除不良影响，公司将保留追究法律责任的权利。
此判决书引起了业内的高度关注，对于专利侵权案件如何判定赔偿数额以及如何维护自己的合法权益，业内专家表示，判决书中的相关表述具有指导意义。
英文标题：
Title: Gree Electric Appliances Pay 167 Million yuan in Damages to ASOTX
Keywords: Gree Electric Appliances, ASOTX, ruling, damages
news content:
Recently, the Hangzhou People’s Court in Zhejiang Province published a judgment report, stating that原告 ASOTX空调股份有限公司以“压缩机”发明专利权被侵害为由，要求被告 Gree Electric Appliances Company赔偿经济损失及合理维权开支共计 3996.17 million yuan and 3332 million yuan. Meanwhile, Gree Electric Appliances Company stated that the patent is invalid and has appealed.
It is known that this case has gone through three rights transfers, and ASOTX Company failed to fulfill its duty to provide evidence of full rights within the period of being sued for infringement. The involved compressor is a product purchased by Gree Electric Appliances Company from Zhuhai凌达压缩机有限公司, and the company paid a reasonable price for it, having legal sources, and therefore, it does not bear responsibility for the compensation.
However, the judgment result has caused ASOTX Company’s strong dissatisfaction. The company immediately released a clarification statement, saying that after investigation, it was found that the patent does not meet the authorization conditions and should be declared invalid; the court also canceled the relevant judgments in Ningbo and Hangzhou courts, and驳回ASOTX的起诉。
Gree Electric Appliances Company also stated that some media and platforms have not fulfilled their verification obligations, and have released false information, which has seriously infringed on the company’s rights and interests, and kindly request relevant information release platforms and media to clarify the issue and eliminate any bad influence promptly, and the company will保留追究法律责任的权利.
This judgment report has attracted a lot of attention in the industry, and experts in the field of patent infringement say that the relevant expressions in the judgment report have guiding significance.
【来源】https://www.ithome.com/0/741/769.htm
Views: 1