Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

0

11 月 7 日,《自然》杂志在官方网站上发布声明,撤回了今年 3 月由兰加·迪亚斯(RangaP.Dias)领衔的室温超导研究。该论文中,迪亚斯团队宣称发现了一种在 1GPa 压强下就能实现室温超导的材料,迅速引发全球关注。但该研究数据真实性与迪亚斯团队的描述不符,引发争议。目前,迪亚斯团队正在接受调查。

该论文的撤稿事件引发了广泛关注,许多科学家对迪亚斯团队的成就表示质疑。撤稿事件暴露了科学研究中的一个敏感问题,即数据真实性与描述的可靠性。在这个事件中,迪亚斯团队的研究成果受到了全球媒体的高度关注,但也面临着质疑。

尽管该论文的研究成果备受争议,但迪亚斯团队仍然具有重要意义。他们在超导领域的研究为世界提供了新的突破,并激发了全球科学家对这一领域的兴趣。此次撤稿事件提醒我们,科学研究中数据真实性与描述的可靠性至关重要,需要更加严格的审查与监管。

英文标题:U.S. team’s groundbreaking superconducting paper retracted by Nature

关键词:U.S., superconducting, paper, retracted, team

新闻内容:

On November 7th, the Nature journal released a statement on its official website, retracting the paper, “Discovery of Low-Temperature Superconductivity in the Presence of Doping” by RangaP. Dias and colleagues, which was published in March this year. The paper claimed to have discovered a superconducting material at room temperature under 1 GPa pressure, which caused a sensation around the world and generated a lot of excitement. However, the accuracy of the research findings has been called into question, and the team led by Dias is currently under investigation.

The retraction of this paper has 引发了 widespread attention and has raised questions about the reliability of scientific research data. In this case, the Dias team’s discovery of a superconducting material at room temperature under 1 GPa pressure has been controversial, with many scientists questioning the accuracy of the research findings. The retraction of the paper highlights the importance of ensuring the accuracy of scientific research data and the reliability of descriptions.

Despite the controversy surrounding the paper’s research findings, the Dias team still holds significant importance. Their work in the field of superconducting materials has provided a new breakthrough and inspired many scientists around the world to pursue research in this area. The retraction of this paper serves as a reminder that the accuracy of scientific research data and the reliability of descriptions are crucial, and more stringent review and regulation are needed.

【来源】https://www.zhihu.com/question/629408459

Views: 1

0

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注