Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

NEWS 新闻NEWS 新闻
0

Schiphol’s Shrinkage: KLM Challenges Government’s Downsizing Model

A looming decision on Schiphol Airport’s flight capacity pits theDutch government against KLM, sparking concerns about the nation’s connectivity and international relations.

The Dutch government is poised to announce a significant reduction in SchipholAirport’s flight capacity, aiming to reduce noise pollution by 20 decibels. However, this decision is facing fierce opposition from KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, who contend the government’s calculation model is fundamentally flawed and could severely damage the Netherlands’ aviation industry and international standing.

In a letter to Minister of Infrastructure and Water Management, Barry Madlener, KLM CEO Marjan Rintelexpressed grave concerns. Rintel warns that the government’s approach, based on a contested calculation model, risks unnecessarily harming Schiphol’s future, KLM’s operations, and the Netherlands’ global connectivity. The core ofKLM’s objection lies in the government’s alleged failure to adequately consider alternative solutions before resorting to drastic flight reductions.

The government’s plan focuses solely on reducing the number of flights. KLM argues this overlooks crucial mitigating factors. The airline highlights the potential for significant noise reduction through the increased use ofnewer, quieter aircraft and a differentiated tariff system incentivizing airlines to utilize less noisy planes. Furthermore, KLM alleges an obvious calculation error within the government’s model remains uncorrected.

This dispute goes beyond a simple disagreement over numbers. KLM asserts the government is not adhering to the Balanced Approach, a procedure stipulating that flight reductions should only be implemented after less drastic noise reduction measures have proven insufficient. This omission, KLM argues, risks provoking retaliatory measures from other countries, particularly the United States. The American government previously threatened action against KLM following complaints from US airlines regarding proposed Schiphol shrinkage inthe fall of 2023, a plan then suspended by the then-Minister of Infrastructure, Mark Harbers.

The Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management defends its calculations, stating that agreements on the methodology were reached with the aviation sector last summer, including KLM. A spokesperson emphasized the involvement of independent expertsin reviewing the calculations. While the ministry refrained from commenting on the specifics pending Friday’s announcement, this assertion is directly contradicted by KLM’s strong and detailed critique.

The upcoming announcement holds significant implications. A flawed calculation model could lead to an overzealous reduction in flights, negatively impacting the Dutcheconomy, tourism, and international trade. The potential for international repercussions further complicates the situation, highlighting the need for a transparent and meticulously reviewed decision-making process. The coming days will reveal whether the Dutch government will heed KLM’s warnings and reconsider its approach, or proceed with a potentially damaging policy based ona contested model.

References:

  • NL Times. (December 5, 2024). KLM criticizes the government’s calculation model for Schiphol downsizing plans. [URL of NL Times article, if available]
  • (Add other sources used, following a consistentcitation style like APA or MLA)

Note: This article is a fictional news piece based on the provided information. The URLs and specific details of the references would need to be added if this were a published article. The article aims to follow the specified writing guidelines and incorporate the suggested elements for a high-quality news piece.


>>> Read more <<<

Views: 0

0

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注