This textappears to be a summary of the first chapter of a series of writings called NineCommentaries (九评), which are critical of the Soviet Communist Party (CPSU)and its leadership.
Here’s a breakdown of the key points and some insights:
Main Arguments:
- The CPSU’sDeviation from Marxism-Leninism: The text argues that the CPSU, under Khrushchev’s leadership, deviated from the principles of Marxism-Leninism andinternational proletarianism. This deviation is seen as the root cause of the split within the international communist movement and specifically between the CPSU and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
- The CPSU’s Peaceful Transition Theory: The textcriticizes the CPSU’s adoption of the peaceful transition theory, which it sees as a betrayal of the revolutionary principles of Marxism-Leninism. The text argues that this theory is inherently flawed and impractical.
- TheCPSU’s Negative Portrayal of Stalin: The text defends Stalin, arguing that he was a true Marxist-Leninist and a leader who made significant contributions to the Soviet Union and the international communist movement. It criticizes Khrushchev’s denunciation of Stalin as a distortion of history and a deliberate attempt to undermine thefoundations of socialism.
- The CPSU’s Role in Splitting the International Communist Movement: The text accuses the CPSU of actively working to split the international communist movement, citing its alliance with the US and its support for anti-socialist forces.
- The CCP’s Resistance to Revisionism: Thetext praises the CCP for its resistance to revisionism and its adherence to the principles of Marxism-Leninism. It sees the Nine Commentaries as a continuation of the CCP’s struggle against revisionism.
Analysis:
- Historical Context: The Nine Commentaries were published in 2004 by the CCP. They were part of a larger campaign to criticize the Soviet Union and its legacy, particularly its collapse in 1991. The text reflects the CCP’s ideological struggle against revisionism and its attempt to present itself as the true heir to the Marxist-Leninist tradition.
*Ideological Critique: The text engages in a strong ideological critique of the CPSU, accusing it of betraying the principles of Marxism-Leninism and ultimately leading to the downfall of socialism in the Soviet Union. - Historical Revisionism: The text’s defense of Stalin and its portrayal of Khrushchev as a revisionist leaderare controversial and based on a particular interpretation of history.
Journalistic Perspective:
As a journalist, I would be interested in exploring the following:
- The Historical Accuracy of the Text: How accurate are the text’s claims about the CPSU’s deviation from Marxism-Leninism and its role inthe split within the international communist movement?
- The Text’s Political Context: What were the political motivations behind the publication of the Nine Commentaries? How did they fit into the CCP’s broader ideological agenda?
- The Impact of the Text: What was the impact of the Nine Commentaries on the international communist movement and on the CCP’s own internal politics?
I would also be interested in interviewing experts on the history of the international communist movement and on the CCP’s ideology to get a more nuanced understanding of the text’s claims and their historical significance.
Views: 0