The concept of collective economy has long been a topic of debate, particularly regarding its impact on individual freedom. A recent article published by the Wu You Zhi Xiang website, written by Zhong Jianmin, delves into this issue, exploring the implications of collective economy on the freedom of individuals.
According to Zhong, the debate over collective economy revolves around the freedom of two distinct groups: asset owners and labor owners. He argues that the freedom of asset owners lies in the existence of a system that fully embodies the rights of asset ownership, while the freedom of labor owners lies in a system that fully embodies the rights of labor ownership.
Zhong asserts that in a society where only two types of individuals can become the main producers—asset owners and labor owners—the establishment of a system that reflects the rights and interests of these two groups is crucial. He further explains that when a society can establish a basic system that fully embodies the rights of labor owners, it reflects the interests of the majority of the population.
However, the question remains: does collective economy eliminate individual freedom? Zhong argues that the elimination of freedom in collective economy is not a threat to the vast majority of the population, but rather to the asset owners.
He points out that in a capitalist society, the majority of the population lacks access to productive resources and must sell their labor to survive. In this context, the concept of freedom and independence is limited to a small group of asset owners. Therefore, when collective economy is implemented, it is aimed at eliminating the independence, individuality, and freedom of asset owners, rather than the majority of the population.
The article also references the views of Ludwig von Mises, who argues that collective economy is the root of the elimination of freedom. However, Zhong disagrees with Mises’ perspective, emphasizing that collective economy does not eliminate the freedom of the majority of the population, but rather the freedom of asset owners.
In conclusion, the debate over the elimination of freedom in collective economy highlights the differing interests of asset owners and labor owners. While some argue that collective economy eliminates individual freedom, others contend that it serves to protect the rights and interests of the majority of the population. As the world continues to evolve, it is crucial to consider the implications of economic systems on individual freedom and strive for a balance between collective and individual interests.
Views: 0