Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

0

In a recent speech by Han Jun, a senior official from the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, he discussed the importance of social service systems in modernizing agriculture and highlighted the example of a 74-year-old woman who manages her own land with help from others. However, the speech has faced significant criticism from netizens, who are not convinced by the argument.

Han Jun’s speech was based on a story of a 74-year-old woman in Hebei province who continues to cultivate 6 acres of land despite her age. She explained that hiring help to plant her crops yields higher income than renting out the land. Han Jun concluded that even in a modernized social service system, elderly individuals can still manage their land effectively and argued that there are multiple paths to agricultural modernization.

While Han Jun’s story is based on real events and reflects his firsthand experience, the reception from netizens has been largely negative. With over 31,000 comments, most of them are skeptical or critical of Han Jun’s arguments.

One common theme in the comments is the question of why the 74-year-old woman is still farming. Some netizens pointed out that this situation highlights the broader issues of rural landlessness, elderly care, and the challenges of agricultural modernization. They argued that relying on elderly individuals to manage farmland is not a sustainable solution to these problems.

Another concern raised by netizens is the lack of understanding of rural issues by Han Jun. Some criticized him for not considering the broader implications of his example and suggested that he should have focused on more comprehensive solutions to rural challenges.

Moreover, netizens questioned the relevance of Han Jun’s example to his conclusions about social service systems and agricultural modernization. They argued that the story does not adequately address the complexities of rural development and does not provide a compelling argument for the importance of social service systems.

Furthermore, netizens called for a more in-depth analysis of rural issues, including the implementation of the Agricultural Collective Economic Organization Law. They suggested that focusing on the development of rural collective economic organizations could be a more effective solution to the challenges faced by elderly farmers.

In conclusion, Han Jun’s speech on rural development and agricultural modernization has sparked a debate among netizens. While the example of the 74-year-old woman may reflect certain aspects of rural life, it does not adequately address the complexities of rural issues and the challenges faced by elderly farmers. Netizens have raised valid concerns about the relevance of the example and the broader implications of Han Jun’s arguments. A more comprehensive and nuanced approach to rural development is needed to address these concerns and ensure sustainable solutions for both farmers and rural communities.


>>> Read more <<<

Views: 0

0

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注