In a recent update, the Chinese Football Association (CFA) has acknowledged and reviewed the outcomes of several controversial match incidents, specifically focusing on handball decisions. The CFA’s裁判评议 panel, responsible for evaluating refereeing decisions, has concluded that in certain instances, the referee’s judgment was mistaken.
Case Study: Handball Decisions in Recent Matches
The CFA’s review of the most recent season’s second ten rounds of matches, from the China Super League, China League One, and China League Two, revealed that out of the six cases submitted by clubs for review, three were found to contain errors or omissions in the refereeing decisions. This includes instances where the referee failed to correctly identify handball offenses and, consequently, did not award penalties.
Detailed Analysis of Handball Cases
Case 1: Misjudgment of Offense
In a match between Jiangxi Luzhan and Heilongjiang Bingcheng, the referee failed to recognize an offense when Jiangxi Luzhan’s player made an illegal contact with Heilongjiang Bingcheng’s player in the penalty area, causing the latter to fall. The CFA’s panel found that Jiangxi Luzhan’s player should have been penalized with a yellow card for this action, as it prevented a clear scoring opportunity for the opposing team. The referee’s decision was deemed incorrect for not penalizing the offense and awarding a direct free kick.
Case 2: Handball Not Recognized
In another match, this time between Liaoning Tiaren and Dalian Yingbo, the referee did not recognize a handball by Liaoning Tiaren’s player. The panel agreed that the player’s arm position made it unnatural for him to not touch the ball, and if he did, it should have been considered a handball. The panel further determined that, given the trajectory of the ball and available footage, it could be concluded that the ball did indeed touch the player’s arm, thus constituting a handball offense that should have resulted in a penalty kick. The referee’s failure to make this call was also deemed incorrect.
VAR’s Role and Limitations
The Chinese Football Association acknowledges the role of Video Assistant Referee (VAR) in such decisions. In the second case, it was noted that the angle provided by the VAR was insufficient to conclusively determine if the ball touched the player’s arm. Despite this, the CFA emphasizes that the VAR’s absence of intervention was not an error but rather a limitation of the technology, not the referee’s decision.
Consequences and Future Actions
The CFA has committed to taking internal actions against the referees who made these mistakes. It also stated that it will continue to review and publish results of such cases to ensure transparency and fairness. The association is committed to improving the quality of refereeing and will consider the feedback from clubs and fans to further refine its approach to decision-making.
Conclusion
The Chinese Football Association’s recent acknowledgment of errors in refereeing decisions is a step towards greater transparency and accountability. By identifying and correcting these mistakes, the CFA aims to improve the integrity of the sport and the overall quality of refereeing in the Chinese football league. The association’s willingness to admit and rectify errors is a positive development, reflecting a commitment to continuous improvement and fairness in the game.
Views: 0