##绘画应用 Procreate 拒绝生成式 AI，引发热议：是坚持原则，还是逆潮流而动？
近日，iPad 上最受欢迎的绘画应用 Procreate 宣布将永远不会在其产品中引入生成式 AI 技术，引发了业界热议。Procreate CEO James Cuda 在视频声明中表示，他不喜欢当前生成式 AI 技术对艺术家的影响，并强调 Procreate 将始终致力于保护艺术家，支持人类创造力。
这一决定在社交媒体上引起了强烈反响，许多用户对 Procreate 的鲜明立场表示赞赏，认为这是“一家真正为艺术家服务，支持艺术家的公司”。然而，也有部分人质疑 Procreate 的决定是否会阻碍其发展，甚至担心其未来会因为压力而改变立场。
Procreate 的拒绝并非毫无道理。近年来，生成式 AI 技术的快速发展引发了诸多争议，尤其是其对艺术家版权的侵犯问题。许多 AI 创业公司利用网络上的作品训练大模型，并将其用于商业化，引发了艺术家和作家的集体诉讼。
Procreate 的决定也体现了其一贯的理念。Procreate 拒绝了近年来流行的订阅制模式，坚持以一次性付费的方式提供服务，并致力于让更多人能够使用其产品。Procreate 还因其在无障碍和包容性方面的努力获得了苹果设计奖。
Procreate 的决定无疑是一次大胆的尝试，它将面临着来自市场和技术的双重压力。但其坚持原则，维护艺术家利益的立场，也为行业发展提供了一种新的思考方向。
Procreate 的未来如何发展，我们尚不得而知。但其勇敢的决定，无疑为我们带来了更多思考：在科技高速发展的时代，如何平衡技术进步与艺术创作，如何保护艺术家权益，如何构建一个更加公平、包容的创作环境，这些问题都需要我们认真思考和探索。
英语如下：
##Procreate Declares War on AI: Refuses Generative AI, Stands WithArtists!
**Keywords:** Procreate, Anti-AI, Artists
**News Content:**
## Painting App Procreate Refuses Generative AI, Sparking Debate: Principled Stand or Going Against the Tide?
Recently, Procreate, the most popular painting app on iPad, announced that it will never incorporate generative AI technology into its products, sparking heated discussions within the industry. In avideo statement, Procreate CEO James Cuda expressed his dislike for the current impact of generative AI technology on artists and emphasized that Procreate will always be committed to protecting artists and supporting human creativity.
This decision has generated strong reactions on socialmedia, with many users praising Procreate’s clear stance, seeing it as “a company that truly serves and supports artists.” However, some have questioned whether Procreate’s decision will hinder its development, even expressing concerns that it mightchange its position under pressure in the future.
Procreate’s refusal is not without reason. In recent years, the rapid development of generative AI technology has sparked numerous controversies, particularly concerning its infringement on artists’ copyrights. Many AI startups have used works from the internet to train large models and then commercialized them,leading to collective lawsuits from artists and writers.
Procreate’s decision also reflects its consistent philosophy. Procreate has refused the subscription model popular in recent years, sticking to a one-time payment model for its services and striving to make its products accessible to more people. Procreate has also received an Apple Design Awardfor its efforts in accessibility and inclusivity.
Procreate’s decision is undoubtedly a bold attempt, facing pressure from both the market and technology. However, its commitment to upholding principles and protecting artists’ interests offers a new direction for industry development.
How Procreate will develop in the future remains unknown. But itscourageous decision undoubtedly raises more questions for us: in an era of rapid technological advancement, how can we balance technological progress with artistic creation, how can we protect artists’ rights, and how can we build a fairer and more inclusive creative environment? These are questions that we need to seriously consider and explore.
【来源】https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/Rwh572C5KFet0W_Y2i986g
Views: 1