近日，一位汽车博主在社交媒体上发布了一段名为《当小米 SU7 撞上一辆极氪 007》的视频，引发了公众的广泛关注和讨论。视频中展示了小米 SU7 在与极氪 007的对撞中，车门无法打开，而极氪 007则车窗和车门均能正常开启，有助于救援。然而，视频的部分画面被质疑存在差异，引发了关于视频真实性的争议。
面对质疑，博主高若翔在视频中回应称，小米 SU7 的小电池在拆下时完好，但在打包装车时被叉车碰坏，导致视频中出现差异。随后，博主发布了新的视频进行说明，并对之前视频中的问题进行了反思和致歉。他承认在视频中关于小米 SU7 电池的问题表述不准确，影响了后续的结论判断，并对小米汽车以及观看视频的观众表示了歉意。
在致歉视频中，博主表示将永久置顶道歉内容和链接，并愿意承担由此造成的所有损失。同时，他承诺将重新梳理内容的制作流程，避免未来的不严谨之处，并放弃类似内容的制作，以避免类似问题的发生。
这一事件也提醒了媒体从业者，在制作涉及专业内容的视频时，应保持高度的严谨性，以确保信息的准确性和观众的信任。对于此类户外对撞测试的内容，由于细节难以完全把控，从业者应当更加小心谨慎，以避免误导公众。
小米汽车方面尚未对此事发表官方声明，但根据已知信息，此次事件已经引起了公众对视频内容真实性的关注，以及对于媒体制作流程和责任的反思。
英语如下：
News Title: “Micromobile SUV Accident with Geely Zeekr Car Raises Suspicion of Fake Crash; Parties Involved Issue Apologies”
Keywords: Accident, Fake, Apology
News Content:
Recently, an automobile blogger posted a video titled “When Micromobile SU7 Collides with a Geely Zeekr 007” on social media, sparking widespread public attention and discussion. The video showed that the Micromobile SU7’s door was unable to open during a collision with the Geely Zeekr 007, while the latter’s windows and doors could open normally for rescue purposes. However, discrepancies in the video’s footage led to questions about its authenticity, sparking a debate.
In response to the质疑, blogger Gao Ruoxiang addressed the issue in the video, stating that the small battery of the Micromobile SU7 was intact when removed, but was damaged by a forklift during the packaging process, leading to discrepancies in the video. Subsequently, the blogger released a new video to clarify the situation and reflected on and apologized for the errors in the previous video. He admitted that the inaccurate portrayal of the Micromobile SU7’s battery issue had affected the subsequent conclusions and expressed regret to the Micromobile car company and the viewers of the video.
In the apology video, the blogger stated that he would permanently pin the apology content and link and be willing to bear all losses caused by it. He also promised to thoroughly review the content production process to avoid future sloppiness and abandon the production of similar content to prevent similar issues from occurring.
This incident also serves as a reminder to media professionals that when producing videos involving professional content, they should maintain a high degree of rigor to ensure the accuracy of the information and the trust of the audience. Given the difficulty in fully controlling the details in outdoor collision testing content, professionals should be even more careful to avoid misleading the public.
As of the information available, Xiaomi Auto has not issued an official statement on the matter, but the event has already drawn public attention to the authenticity of video content and prompted reflection on the production process and responsibilities of media professionals.
【来源】https://www.ithome.com/0/788/538.htm
Views: 2