近日，广州天河区法院智慧城法庭成功调解了一起涉及应届毕业生的培训合同纠纷，为14名毕业生解除了与某科技有限公司的培训贷款合约。这起纠纷源于毕业生小唐等人在求职过程中，被该公司承诺的“既能学技能，又能赚工资”的招聘条件所吸引，但实际培训内容与预期不符，且贷款金额较大，导致毕业生们陷入了财务困境。
小唐与该公司签订了一份《实训带教协议》，约定该公司提供为期3个月的媒体运营课程，并保证就业服务。小唐随后通过网贷平台贷款2.6万余元支付培训费。然而，培训内容与宣传不符，小唐等学员遂向公司要求退课退款，但遭到拒绝。
智慧城法庭庭长廖敏敏意识到该纠纷的涉众性，立即启动快速处理机制。她与新塘司法所协调，了解公司的经营情况，并与公司所在地的新塘街道联点法官陈宇帆共同工作。通过“背对背”调解方式，双方最终达成和解协议，公司承诺退还学员剩余款项，并消除贷款记录。
此次调解不仅为毕业生们解除了经济负担，也提醒了企业和求职者双方在签订合同时应谨慎考虑，避免类似纠纷的发生。法庭和教育机构也应加强对毕业生就业指导，帮助他们识别招聘中的“套路”，确保就业市场的公平与透明。
英语如下：
News Title: “Beware of the 26,000 Yuan Training Trap: Graduates Need to Be Cautious in Job Hunting”
Keywords: Training, Employment, Uncoupling
News Content: Recently, the Intelligent City Court of Tianhe District, Guangzhou, successfully mediated a training contract dispute involving college graduates, freeing 14 graduates from a training loan contract with a certain technology company. The dispute originated from a situation where graduates, such as Xiao Tang, were attracted by the company’s recruitment conditions promising “learning skills while earning a salary” during their job hunting process. However, the actual training content did not match their expectations, and the loan amount was substantial, leading the graduates into financial difficulties.
Xiao Tang signed a “Practical Training and Teaching Agreement” with the company, which promised a three-month course in media operation and guaranteed employment services. Xiao Tang then borrowed 26,000 yuan for the training fee through an online lending platform. However, the training content did not match the advertised information, so Xiao Tang and other students demanded to be withdrawn from the course and refunded their money, but their requests were denied.
Presiding Judge Liao Minmin of the Intelligent City Court recognized the mass nature of the dispute and immediately initiated a rapid resolution mechanism. She coordinated with the New Tang Judicial Office to understand the company’s business situation and worked together with Judge Chen Yufan from the New Tang Street, the company’s location. Through “face-to-face” mediation, the parties finally reached a settlement agreement, with the company promising to refund the remaining tuition fees to the students and erase the loan records.
This mediation not only relieved the economic burden on the graduates but also reminded both companies and job seekers to be cautious when signing contracts to avoid similar disputes. Courts and educational institutions should also strengthen guidance for graduates in employment, helping them to identify “schemes” in job recruitment and ensure the fairness and transparency of the job market.
【来源】http://www.chinanews.com/sh/2024/07-29/10259249.shtml
Views: 3