国内大模型技术领域的打假行动迎来里程碑式进展，阿里云在与山寨通义千问App的法律较量中取得一审胜诉。近日，据IT之家报道，阿里巴巴集团及阿里云在针对飞游科技公司侵权一案中获得法院支持，这是国内大模型知识产权维权的首例胜诉判决。
法院认定，飞游科技公司未经许可，擅自使用与阿里云注册商标“通义千问”相似的标识，构成了对阿里云商标权的侵犯。同时，该公司在其App及宣传中进行虚假陈述，误导公众，法院判定其行为构成虚假宣传。因此，法院判决飞游科技公司需赔偿阿里云及阿里巴巴因侵权造成的经济损失及维权费用，并要求其在官方网站上连续十五日发布道歉声明，以消除不良影响。
此次胜诉不仅为阿里云正名，也彰显了我国司法系统对知识产权保护的重视和决心，为大模型技术领域的健康发展树立了积极的示范。此案的判决结果对整个行业具有重要意义，预示着未来对于侵犯知识产权和虚假宣传的行为，法律将给予更严厉的打击和惩罚，以维护市场的公平竞争和技术创新的合法权益。
英语如下：
News Title: “Alibaba Cloud Scores a Victory in a Landmark Counterfeit Case: Counterfeit Qwen App Ordered to Pay Compensation and Apologize”
Keywords: Alibaba Cloud victory, counterfeit Qwen, trademark infringement
News Content:
Title: Alibaba Cloud Wins Landmark Case Against Counterfeit Qwen App, Marking First Domestic Big Model IP Infringement Judgment
A milestone has been reached in China’s efforts to combat counterfeiting in the big model technology sector, as Alibaba Cloud secured a preliminary court victory against a counterfeit Qwen App. As reported recently by IT Home, the Alibaba Group and Alibaba Cloud won a court ruling in their case against Feiyou Technology Co. Ltd. for infringement, marking the first such victory for intellectual property rights (IPR) protection in the domestic big model industry.
The court determined that Feiyou Technology had used a logo similar to Alibaba Cloud’s registered trademark “Qwen” without permission, constituting trademark infringement. Furthermore, the company made false statements in its app and promotional materials, misleading the public, which the court ruled as constituting false advertising. Consequently, the court ordered Feiyou Technology to compensate Alibaba Cloud and the Alibaba Group for economic losses and维权 expenses resulting from the infringement. The company was also required to issue an apology statement on its official website for 15 consecutive days to mitigate the adverse impact.
This victory not only vindicates Alibaba Cloud but also underscores the Chinese judicial system’s commitment to IPR protection. It sets a positive example for the healthy development of the big model technology field. The ruling carries significant implications for the industry, foreshadowing stricter punishment and deterrence for intellectual property violations and false advertising in the future, thereby preserving fair competition and protecting the legitimate rights of technological innovation.
【来源】https://www.ithome.com/0/745/512.htm
Views: 1