【“脑机接口之父”米格尔·尼科莱利斯批驳马斯克Neuralink，称《黑客帝国》场景不现实】
巴西著名神经生物学家米格尔·尼科莱利斯，被誉为“脑机接口之父”，近日在一次访谈中对特斯拉CEO马斯克的Neuralink项目提出了尖锐批评，认为其在脑机接口技术上的创新性不足。尼科莱利斯教授明确表示，《黑客帝国》中描绘的意识上传场景在现实世界中永远不可能发生，因为人类的记忆是以模拟方式而非数字方式存储的。
尼科莱利斯强调，侵入式脑机接口技术的初衷是用于科学研究，而非商业化应用，它并不应成为普遍的医疗选择。“对于患者来说，这并不是最佳方案。植入物应该仅限于非常严重的病例，或者为全身完全瘫痪的极少数患者提供帮助。”他说道。
此外，尼科莱利斯对未来人工智能的发展持谨慎态度，认为AI并不能取代人类。他指出，尽管AI技术在某些领域取得了显著进步，但其本质仍依赖于人类。尼科莱利斯教授坚信：“真正的智能是不可计算的，人类的思维和情感无法被简化为数字逻辑或公式。因此，人类与AI的关系应当是互补而非替代。”
这一观点为公众对脑机接口和人工智能的讨论提供了新的视角，引发了对技术伦理和未来科技发展方向的深入思考。来源：腾讯科技。
英语如下：
**News Title:** “Father of Brain-Computer Interface Debunks Musk: The ‘Matrix’-like Fantasy Unattainable”
**Keywords:** Brain-Computer Interface, Miguel Nicolelis critique, Elon Musk’s Neuralink
**News Content:** [“Father of Brain-Computer Interface,” Miguel Nicolelis, Critiques Musk’s Neuralink, Saying ‘The Matrix’ Scenario Unfeasible]
Renowned Brazilian neurobiologist Miguel Nicolelis, known as the “father of brain-computer interfaces,” recently criticized Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s Neuralink project in an interview, arguing that it lacks significant innovation in brain-computer interface technology. Professor Nicolelis firmly stated that the scenario of consciousness uploading depicted in “The Matrix” would never be possible in reality, as human memory is stored analogically, not digitally.
Nicolelis emphasized that invasive brain-computer interfaces are intended for scientific research, not commercial applications, and should not become a common medical choice. “This is not the best option for patients. Implants should be limited to very severe cases or to help a very small number of patients with complete paralysis,” he said.
Furthermore, Nicolelis adopts a cautious stance on the development of artificial intelligence, believing that AI cannot replace humans. He pointed out that while AI has made remarkable strides in certain areas, it still relies fundamentally on human input. Professor Nicolelis asserts, “True intelligence is incalculable; human thought and emotion cannot be reduced to digital logic or formulas. Hence, the relationship between humans and AI should be complementary, not substitutional.”
This perspective offers a new angle to public discussions on brain-computer interfaces and artificial intelligence, prompting deeper reflections on technological ethics and the direction of future tech development. _Source: Tencent Technology_
【来源】https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20240122A0A16O00
Views: 1