美国联邦最高法院于当地时间20日宣布，将不受理针对弗吉尼亚州一顶尖高中招生政策的诉讼。这起诉讼指控该校的招生政策存在对亚裔学生的种族歧视。
这起案件起因于一组名为“学生公平录取”（Students for Fair Admissions, SFFA）的团体对哈佛大学招生政策提出的诉讼。该团体指控哈佛大学在录取过程中，对亚裔美国申请者的评分低于其他族裔，这种做法违反了联邦民权法。尽管联邦地区法院和上诉法院先后驳回了SFFA的指控，认为哈佛的招生政策不具有歧视性，但SFFA继续向最高法院提起上诉。
最高法院的这一决定引起了广泛的关注和讨论。批评者认为，最高法院的决定意味着对亚裔学生的歧视行为将继续被容忍。而支持者则认为，最高法院的决定是基于对现行法律和政策的尊重，不应被解读为对歧视行为的认可。
Title: U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Case Alleging Discrimination Against Asian Americans in Admissions
Keywords: Supreme Court, Asian Discrimination, Admissions Policy
News content:
The U.S. Supreme Court announced on Tuesday that it would not hear a lawsuit challenging the admissions policy of a top school in Virginia, which has been accused of racial discrimination against Asian American students.
The case originated from a group called “Students for Fair Admissions” (SFFA) suing Harvard University’s admission policy. The group alleged that Harvard’s admission process gives lower scores to Asian American applicants compared to other ethnic groups, violating federal civil rights laws. Although both the federal district court and the appeals court dismissed SFFA’s claims, ruling that Harvard’s admission policy is not discriminatory, SFFA continued to appeal to the Supreme Court.
This decision by the Supreme Court has sparked widespread attention and discussion. Critics argue that the decision means that discriminatory practices against Asian students will continue to be tolerated. Supporters, however, believe that the decision reflects respect for current laws and policies and should not be interpreted as condoning discriminatory behaviors.
【来源】http://www.chinanews.com/gj/2024/02-21/10167174.shtml
Views: 1