近日，科技部发布了《负责任研究行为规范指引（2023）》，明确规定了科研人员在进行研究时应遵循的一系列科学道德准则和学术研究规范。其中一条规定引起了广泛关注：禁止使用生成式人工智能直接生成申报材料。
科技部监督司在制定这份指引时，考虑到了科技发展的新趋势以及科技伦理的重要性。随着人工智能技术的发展，越来越多的研究人员开始尝试利用AI来辅助他们的工作，包括生成报告、设计实验方案等。然而，这也带来了一些问题。比如，如果让AI直接生成申报材料，那么这些申报材料的真实性就无法得到保障。此外，如果将AI列为成果共同完成人，也会引发一些争议。
因此，《负责任研究行为规范指引（2023）》明确指出，科研人员不应使用生成式人工智能直接生成申报材料，也不应将AI列为成果共同完成人。这意味着，研究人员需要更加重视自己的工作，不能依赖AI来代替他们思考和判断。同时，这也是对科技伦理的一种体现，即科技发展必须以人类的利益为出发点，而不是简单地追求效率和速度。
总的来说，这份指引对于科研人员来说是一份重要的指南，它提醒他们要始终保持警惕，不能盲目依赖AI。只有这样，才能确保科研工作的质量和真实性，从而推动科技进步和社会发展。
英语如下：
News Title: “Ministry of Science and Technology Regulates AI Use, Prohibits AIGC from Generating Application Materials!”
Keywords: Ministry of Science and Technology regulations on AI, prohibition of AIGC-generated application materials, emphasis on scientific ethics
News Content: Recently, the Ministry of Science and Technology released the “Guidelines for Responsible Research Behavior (2023)”, which clearly stipulated a series of scientific ethical norms and academic research standards that researchers should follow when conducting research. One provision has attracted widespread attention: the prohibition of using generative artificial intelligence to directly generate application materials.
When formulating these guidelines, the Ministry of Supervision took into account the new trends in technological development and the importance of scientific ethics. With the development of artificial intelligence technology, more and more researchers have begun to try to use AI to assist their work, including generating reports and designing experimental plans. However, this also brings some problems. For example, if AI is allowed to directly generate application materials, the authenticity of these materials cannot be guaranteed. In addition, if AI is listed as a co-author of the results, it may also cause controversy.
Therefore, the “Guidelines for Responsible Research Behavior (2023)” explicitly state that researchers should not use generative artificial intelligence to directly generate application materials, nor should they list AI as a co-author of the results. This means that researchers need to attach greater importance to their own work and cannot rely on AI to replace their thinking and judgment. At the same time, this is also an embodiment of scientific ethics, that is, the development of science and technology must take human interests as its starting point, rather than simply pursuing efficiency and speed.
Overall, this guideline serves as an important guide for researchers, reminding them to remain vigilant and not blindly rely on AI. Only by doing so can we ensure the quality and truthfulness of research work and thus promote technological progress and social development.
【来源】https://www.ithome.com/0/743/159.htm
Views: 1