近日，被誉为“脑机接口之父”的巴西神经生物学家米格尔·尼科莱利斯在接受采访时，对马斯克旗下的Neuralink进行了犀利的批评。他直言，《黑客帝国》中的意识上传场景在现实世界中永远不可能发生。
米格尔表示，人类的记忆是以模拟方式而非数字方式存储的，因此侵入式脑机接口无法帮助人类实现意识上传。他还指出，侵入式脑机接口的初衷是为了科研，但对患者并不是最优选择。植入物应仅限于非常严重的病例中或少数全身完全瘫痪的患者。
此外，米格尔还强调了未来人工智能并不能取代人类的观点。他认为，目前AI技术仍旧依赖于人类，真正的智能是不可计算的。人类不能被简化为数字逻辑，也不能用公式来表示。
这一观点无疑对Neuralink的发展提出了质疑。作为一家致力于将人脑与计算机直接连接的公司，Neuralink的目标是实现人脑与计算机的无缝对接，从而提高人类的认知能力和行动能力。然而，米格尔的批评也让我们看到了这一技术的局限性。
事实上，脑机接口技术一直以来都备受关注。一方面，它有望帮助残疾人恢复行动能力；另一方面，它也引发了关于人类隐私和道德问题的争议。在这种情况下，我们需要更加审慎地对待这一技术的发展，以确保它能够真正造福人类社会。
英语如下：
Title: “Father of Brain-Computer Interfaces Miguel: Neuralink Lacks Innovation, ‘The Matrix’ Reality Is Difficult to Realize”
Keywords: Miguel criticizes Musk, limitations of brain-computer interfaces, artificial intelligence cannot be replaced.
News Content: In an interview recently, the Brazilian neurobiologist Miguel Nicolelis, known as the “father of brain-computer interfaces,” sharply criticized Neuralink, a company founded by Elon Musk. He said that the scene of consciousness uploading in “The Matrix” could never happen in the real world.
Miguel said that human memories are stored in a simulated rather than digital way, making invasive brain-computer interfaces unable to help humans achieve consciousness uploading. He also pointed out that the original intention of invasive brain-computer interfaces was for scientific research, but they were not the best choice for patients. Implants should be limited to very serious cases or patients with total paralysis.
In addition, Miguel emphasized the view that future artificial intelligence cannot replace humans. He believed that current AI technology still relies on humans and true intelligence is uncomputable. Humans cannot be simplified into digital logic nor can they be expressed in formulas.
This perspective undoubtedly raises questions about the development of Neuralink. As a company committed to connecting the human brain directly to computers, Neuralink aims to achieve seamless integration between the human brain and computers, thereby improving human cognitive ability and action ability. However, Miguel’s criticism also shows us the limitations of this technology.
In fact, brain-computer interface technology has always been highly concerned about. On the one hand, it is expected to help people with disabilities recover their mobility; on the other hand, it has sparked controversy about human privacy and ethical issues. In this context, we need to treat the development of this technology more cautiously to ensure that it can truly benefit human society.
【来源】https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20240122A0A16O00
Views: 1