近日，1.6万名英国艺术家联名计划对生成式AI软件Midjourney和其他人工智能公司发起集体诉讼。自从Midjourney等AI图像生成软件问世以来，艺术家们开始关注并思考人工智能对他们职业的影响。这场持久战预计将在艺术家和AI公司之间打响。
据悉，这些艺术家认为，AI公司的Midjourney等软件已经侵犯了他们的版权和知识产权。他们认为，这些软件通过模仿艺术家的作品，不仅剥夺了他们的创作灵感，还严重损害了他们的声誉和经济利益。
此外，一些艺术家还担心，随着AI技术的不断发展，越来越多的人将选择使用AI生成的作品来代替自己的创作，这将导致艺术市场的萎缩和艺术家的失业率上升。
对于这一事件，一些专家表示支持。他们认为，AI技术的确存在一定的风险和挑战，需要得到更多的监管和规范。同时，也需要更多的政策和措施来保护艺术家的权益和利益。
不过，也有一些人对此表示质疑。他们认为，这种集体诉讼不仅缺乏实际意义，还会浪费大量的时间和资源。而且，这些AI软件本身并没有直接造成任何损失或伤害，因此不应该承担过多的责任和义务。
总之，这次集体诉讼引起了广泛的关注和讨论。无论最终结果如何，它都反映了当前社会对于人工智能技术和艺术创作的复杂态度和看法。希望在未来的发展中，我们能够更好地平衡科技与人文的关系，创造出更加美好的世界。
英语如下：
Title: “16,000 British Artists Unite to Sue Midjourney and Other AI Companies in a Battle Between Art and Technology”
Keywords: British artists, AI software, class action lawsuit
Recently, 16,000 British artists have jointly planned to file a class action lawsuit against AI software companies such as Midjourney and other artificial intelligence companies. Since the emergence of AI image generation software like Midjourney, artists have begun to pay attention to and ponder the impact of artificial intelligence on their profession. This long-term battle is expected to take place between artists and AI companies.
It is reported that these artists believe that AI companies such as Midjourney have violated their copyrights and intellectual property rights. They argue that these software programs not only deprive them of creative inspiration but also seriously damage their reputation and economic interests by imitating their works.
In addition, some artists are concerned that with the continuous development of AI technology, more and more people will choose to use AI-generated works instead of their own creations, which will lead to a shrinkage of the art market and an increase in the unemployment rate of artists.
Regarding this event, some experts expressed support. They believed that AI technology did have certain risks and challenges that needed more regulation and norms. At the same time, more policies and measures were needed to protect the rights and interests of artists.
However, some people质疑 this approach. They argued that this class action lawsuit not only lacks practical significance but also wastes a lot of time and resources. Moreover, these AI software programs themselves did not cause any direct loss or harm, so they should not bear too much responsibility and obligations.
In conclusion, this class action has attracted widespread attention and discussion. Regardless of the final outcome, it reflects the complex attitudes and perspectives of society towards artificial intelligence technology and artistic creation. We hope that in future developments, we can better balance the relationship between technology and humanities and create a better world.
【来源】https://www.yicai.com/news/101966112.html
Views: 1