标题：重庆农妇卖粉蒸肉案终审结果出炉：原告撤诉，原判决被撤销
封面新闻记者 李茂佳报道，备受关注的“重庆农妇售卖150碗自制粉蒸肉被判10倍赔偿案件”近日迎来最终结局。据忠县毛妈妈土特产经营部负责人王某的律师透露，重庆市高级人民法院已于去年作出民事裁定，准许原告邵某撤诉，并撤销了原一审和二审判决。
这起案件自去年起就引起了社会的广泛关注。原告邵某以被告王某未经许可销售其专利产品粉蒸肉为由，将其告上法庭，要求赔偿10倍的经济损失。然而，经过一审和二审，法院均判决王某需赔偿邵某5万元。
然而，这一判决在社会上引起了广泛的争议。许多人认为，王某的粉蒸肉并非邵某的专利产品，而且王某的粉蒸肉是自家制作，没有侵犯邵某的权益。因此，王某及其律师决定向高级人民法院提起上诉。
经过审理，重庆市高级人民法院最终裁定准许原告邵某撤诉，并撤销了原一审和二审判决。这一结果也意味着，王某无需再对邵某进行赔偿。
这起案件的最终结果，不仅为王某解除了经济负担，也为社会传递了一个明确的信号：任何行为都应在法律允许的范围内进行，不能随意侵犯他人的权益。同时，也提醒广大消费者，对于购买的商品和服务，应有基本的法律意识，避免盲目维权。
英语如下：
====
“News Headline: “Chongqing Farmer’s Steamed Pork====
“News Headline: “Chongqing Farmer’s Steamed Pork Case Comes to a Close: Plaintiff Withdraws, Original Verdict Revoked”
Keywords: Farmer Withdraws, Verdict Revoked, Steamed Pork Case
News Content: Title: Final Outcome of Chongqing Farmer Selling 150 Bowls of Homemade Steamed Pork: Plaintiff Withdraws, Original Verdict Revoked
Reported by Li Maojia, a journalist from the Cover Newspaper, the highly anticipated “Chongqing Farmer’s Case of Selling 150 Bowls of Self-Made Steamed Pork and Being Ordered to Pay 10 Times Compensation” has reached its final conclusion. According to Wang Moumou, the legal representative of Zhongxian Mama’s Specialty Business Department, the People’s Court of Chongqing Municipality issued a civil ruling last year, allowing the plaintiff Shao Mou to withdraw the lawsuit and revoke the original first instance and second instance verdicts.
This case has attracted widespread attention since last year. The plaintiff Shao Mou sued the defendant Wang Moumou for selling his patented product, steamed pork, without permission, demanding compensation for 10 times the economic loss. However, after the first instance and second instance, the court ruled that Wang Moumou must compensate Shao Mou for 50,000 yuan.
However, this verdict has sparked widespread controversy in society. Many people believe that Wang Moumou’s steamed pork is not Shao Mou’s patented product, and that Wang Moumou’s steamed pork is homemade and did not infringe on Shao Mou’s rights. Therefore, Wang Moumou and his lawyer decided to appeal to the Higher People’s Court.
After review, the Higher People’s Court of Chongqing finally ruled to allow the plaintiff Shao Mou to withdraw the lawsuit and revoke the original first instance and second instance verdicts. This result also means that Wang Moumou no longer needs to compensate Shao Mou.
The final outcome of this case not only relieved Wang Moumou of financial burden, but also sent a clear signal to society: All actions should be within the scope permitted by law and cannot infringe on others’ rights at will. At the same time, it reminds consumers to have basic legal awareness when purchasing goods and services, avoiding blind rights protection.”
【来源】https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20240113A0754C00
Views: 1