据英国最高法院当地时间20日公布的判决结果显示,一名美国计算机科学家在为其人工智能系统创造的发明申请专利时败诉。根据目前的判决结果,英国最高法院驳回了他的要求,因为根据英国专利法,专利的发明人必须是自然人。

英国最高法院的这一判决引起了广泛关注,因为此前的相关法规并未对发明人的身份做出明确规定。而此次判决明确了专利发明人的身份,也让人们开始思考如何在这个领域创新。

虽然人工智能在许多领域都表现出了出色的能力,但在专利申请中,目前仍无法以自然人的身份进行发明。这也提醒我们在人工智能领域的研究者,在申请专利时需注意相关法规的规定。

新闻翻译:

British Supreme Court rules that the inventor of a patent must be a natural person.

Keywords: British Supreme Court, patent, inventor, artificial intelligence

News content:

On the afternoon of the 20th day, the British Supreme Court announced a ruling in a patent dispute case involving an American computer scientist. The court upheld the rejection of the scientist’s patent application for invention, as required by British patent law, which states that the inventor must be a natural person.

This ruling has attracted widespread attention, as previous relevant laws did not explicitly define the identity of the inventor. The court’s decision clarifies the identity of the inventor in this field and has prompted people to consider how to innovate in this area.

Although artificial intelligence has shown excellent capabilities in many fields, it cannot be approved as an inventor in patent applications at present. This also reminds researchers in the field of artificial intelligence to pay attention to relevant laws when applying for patents.

【来源】https://www.ithome.com/0/740/657.htm

Views: 1

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注