Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

0

The 2023 Nobel Prize in Physics, awarded to renowned AI researchers John J.Hopfield and Geoffrey E. Hinton, has ignited a storm of controversy within the scientific community. While many celebrate the recognition of AI’s contributions to physics,questions about the award’s legitimacy and the transparency of the nomination process have surfaced.

A Controversial Choice:

The award has sparked debate due tothe perceived disconnect between Hinton’s work and the traditional scope of physics. Critics argue that Hinton’s contributions, primarily in the field of deep learning, are more closely aligned with computer science than physics. This has led to questions about therationale behind awarding a physics prize to an AI researcher.

Jürgen Schmidhuber’s Outrage:

One of the most vocal critics is Jürgen Schmidhuber, a prominent AI researcher known for his pioneering work on recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Schmidhuber has long been critical of Hinton’s work, claiming that Hinton’s research on backpropagation and deep learning builds upon his own earlier contributions.

Schmidhuber, often referred to as the father of LSTM, argues that the Nobel Prize unfairly overlooks his own significant contributions to the field of AI. Hebelieves that the award is a case of plagiarism and misattribution within the field of computer science.

Nature Magazine Raises Concerns:

Adding fuel to the fire, Nature magazine has also expressed concerns about the lack of transparency surrounding the Nobel Prize nomination process. The magazine argues that the secretive nature of the processmakes it difficult to assess the fairness and legitimacy of the award.

Hopfield’s Contributions to Physics:

While the award to Hinton has sparked debate, Hopfield’s contributions to physics are less contested. His work on the Hopfield model, a theoretical framework in statistical physics, has had a profound impacton understanding neural networks and their applications in various fields.

The Future of AI Recognition:

The controversy surrounding the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physics highlights the ongoing debate about the role of AI in scientific research and the evolving nature of scientific disciplines. As AI continues to make significant contributions to various fields,questions about how to recognize and acknowledge these contributions will likely continue to be debated.

References:

  • [Link to Nature article on the Nobel Prize controversy]
  • [Link to Jürgen Schmidhuber’s statement on the Nobel Prize]
  • [Link to a scientific article discussing Hopfield’s contributions to physics]


>>> Read more <<<

Views: 0

0

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注