近日,特斯拉和SpaceX的创始人埃隆·马斯克计划与前美国总统唐纳德·特朗普进行一场直播采访,不料却遭遇了技术故障,直播中途突然中断。此次事件引起了广泛关注,马斯克最初将故障归咎于大规模的DDoS攻击,但随后遭到了专家和公众的质疑。

据报道,直播开始时,有12.3万观众试图进入SpaceX的直播间,但直播仅持续了18分钟后就因技术问题被迫中断。马斯克在社交媒体上表示,X平台遭遇了DDoS攻击,导致服务中断。然而,网络安全专家表示,DDoS攻击通常会导致整个平台瘫痪,而不仅仅是直播功能受到影响。此外,其他X平台服务并未出现明显问题,这使得DDoS攻击的说法难以令人信服。

专家认为,直播失败可能是由于X平台的服务器无法处理大量用户的并发访问,导致系统崩溃。他们指出,真正的DDoS攻击通常是由网络攻击者发起的,而这次事件并没有显示出这种攻击的特征。

此外,有X平台的员工向媒体透露,实际上并没有发生拒绝服务攻击,马斯克关于攻击的说法很可能是一个谎言。员工还表示,马斯克关于平台能够支持800万同时在线用户的说法也值得怀疑,因为公司之前已经裁减了80%的员工,测试的可靠性和全面性存疑。

此次直播事件再次凸显了科技公司在应对大规模在线活动时的技术挑战。尽管马斯克试图将责任归咎于外部攻击,但公众和专家普遍认为,直播失败更可能是由于内部技术和准备不足所致。这次事件不仅让马斯克和X平台的声誉受到了影响,也提醒了其他科技公司需要在重大活动前进行充分的技术准备和压力测试。

英语如下:

News Title: “120,000 Users Caused the System to Collapse? Musk’s Live Stream Suffers Major Fault”

Keywords: Crash, Live Stream, Expert

News Content: Recently, Elon Musk, the founder of Tesla and SpaceX, planned a live interview with former President Donald Trump, only to encounter a technical malfunction that abruptly ended the broadcast. The incident sparked widespread attention. Initially, Musk blamed the fault on a massive Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack, but this was subsequently questioned by experts and the public.

Reports indicate that when the live stream began, 123,000 viewers attempted to enter the SpaceX broadcast room, but the stream was cut off due to technical issues after only 18 minutes. On social media, Musk claimed that the X platform had been hit by a DDoS attack, leading to service disruption. However, cybersecurity experts argue that a DDoS attack would typically bring down the entire platform, not just the live streaming function. Additionally, there were no significant issues reported with other X platform services, making the DDoS attack explanation difficult to accept.

Experts suggest that the failure of the live stream may have been due to the X platform’s servers being unable to handle the simultaneous access from a large number of users, resulting in a system crash. They point out that a true DDoS attack is usually initiated by network attackers, and this event did not exhibit the characteristics of such an attack.

Furthermore, an X platform employee revealed to media outlets that no denial-of-service attack actually occurred, and it is likely that Musk’s claim about the attack is a fabrication. The employee also mentioned that Musk’s assertion that the platform can support 800,000 concurrent users is questionable, given that the company has already laid off 80% of its employees, casting doubt on the reliability and comprehensiveness of the testing.

The live stream incident once again highlights the technical challenges faced by tech companies when dealing with large-scale online events. Despite Musk’s attempt to blame the issue on external attack, both the public and experts generally believe that the failure of the live stream is more likely due to internal technical and preparation shortcomings. This incident not only affects Musk and the X platform’s reputation but also serves as a reminder to other tech companies to conduct thorough technical preparations and stress tests before significant events.

【来源】https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/gAcxQlrHEMJkf5FbGdrwoA

Views: 1

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注