近日，知名歌手薛之谦因分享电影《飞驰人生2》观后感引发“盗摄”争议。2月15日，“薛之谦盗摄”一词登上微博热搜。薛之谦在微博发布的文章中，附带了3张在电影院拍摄的电影画面，此举被指违反摄影规定，引发网友热议。
面对质疑，薛之谦于2月16日发表了一首打油诗疑似回应争议。诗中他写道：“此心光明，亦复何言”，表达了自己内心的坦荡以及对争议的看法。这首打油诗一经发布，便引起了网友们的广泛关注和讨论。
对于这一事件，公众的关注点主要集中在薛之谦是否确实存在“盗摄”行为，以及他通过打油诗回应争议的用意和态度。不少网友认为，即使薛之谦在电影院拍摄电影画面确实违反了规定，但作为公众人物，他应该更加注意自己的行为，以免给粉丝和公众带来不良影响。
英文标题：Xue Zhiqian Allegedly Responds to “Illegal Photography” Controversy with a Riddle Poem
关键词：Xue Zhiqian，illegal photography controversy，riddle poem response
英文新闻内容：
Recently, the well-known singer Xue Zhiqian sparked a controversy over “illegal photography” by sharing his review of the movie “Flying Life 2”. On February 15, the term “Xue Zhiqian illegal photography” topped the hot search on Weibo. In the article he posted on Weibo, Xue Zhiqian attached three photos taken in a movie theater, which is considered a violation of photography regulations and has caused a heated discussion among netizens.
Facing the质疑, Xue Zhiqian published a riddle poem on February 16, which seems to respond to the controversy. In the poem, he wrote: “With a bright heart, what else can I say”, expressing his inner calm and his view on the controversy. Once the riddle poem was released, it attracted widespread attention and discussion from netizens.
The public’s focus on this event is mainly集中在Xue Zhiqian是否确实存在”盗摄”行为,以及他通过谜语诗回应争议的意图和态度. Many netizens believe that even if Xue Zhiqian’s photography in the movie theater did violate regulations, as a public figure, he should be more cautious in his actions to avoid bringing不良影响 to his fans and the public.
【来源】http://www.chinanews.com/sh/2024/02-20/10166107.shtml
Views: 2