据我国IT之家报道，英国最高法院在当地时间20日的判决中裁定，专利的发明人必须是自然人，而非人工智能。这一判决结果出炉后，一名美国计算机科学家为其人工智能系统创造的发明申请专利的请求被驳回。
英国最高法院在判决中明确表示，根据英国专利法，发明人必须是自然人。这一判决意味着，尽管人工智能在创新和发明方面具有巨大的潜力，但其无法享有与自然人相同的专利权益。
这一判决引发了关于人工智能在创新领域角色的讨论。一些人认为，这一判决限制了人工智能的发展空间，可能导致许多具有重要价值的发明和创新无法得到充分保护。而另一些人则认为，这一判决确保了专利制度的公平性和严谨性，防止了人工智能滥用专利权益的情况发生。
Title: UK Supreme Court rules that AI cannot be patent inventors
Keywords: UK Supreme Court, AI, patent inventors
News Content:
According to IT Home, the UK Supreme Court ruled that the inventor of a patent must be a natural person, not an artificial intelligence. In the judgment released on Tuesday, the court rejected a request from a US computer scientist who applied for a patent for an invention created by his artificial intelligence system. The court clearly stated that according to UK patent law, the inventor must be a natural person. This ruling means that although artificial intelligence has great potential in innovation and invention, it cannot enjoy the same patent rights as natural persons.
The ruling has sparked discussions about the role of artificial intelligence in the innovation field. Some believe that this ruling limits the development space of artificial intelligence and may lead to many innovative and valuable inventions and innovations being insufficiently protected. Others believe that this ruling ensures the fairness and rigor of the patent system and prevents the abuse of patent rights by artificial intelligence.
【来源】https://www.ithome.com/0/740/657.htm
Views: 1