标题：英国最高法院裁定：人工智能无法成为专利发明人
据路透社报道，英国最高法院于当地时间20日公布判决结果，一名美国计算机科学家在为其人工智能系统创造的发明申请专利时败诉。这意味着，根据英国专利法，专利的发明人必须是自然人，人工智能无法成为专利发明人。
在这起案件中，该名美国计算机科学家为其开发的人工智能系统申请了专利。然而，英国最高法院驳回了他的要求，原因是英国专利法规定，专利的发明人必须是自然人。这一裁决引发了关于人工智能是否应该被视为法律主体的讨论。
近年来，随着人工智能技术的快速发展，越来越多的企业和个人开始利用人工智能进行创新和研究。然而，在这一过程中，如何保护人工智能产生的知识产权成为了一个亟待解决的问题。目前，世界各国对于这一问题的看法并不一致，有些国家允许将人工智能作为专利申请的发明人，而有些国家则坚持要求发明人必须是自然人。
英国最高法院此次的裁决为英国国内的知识产权保护政策提供了明确的指导。未来，英国的企业和研究机构在开发和应用人工智能技术时，可能需要更加关注知识产权保护的问题。同时，这也为其他国家在处理类似问题时提供了参考。
英语如下：
Title: UK Supreme Court Decides: Artificial Intelligence Cannot Be the Inventor of a Patent
Keywords: British patent law, artificial intelligence, patent application
Content: The title: The UK Supreme Court Decides: Artificial Intelligence Cannot Be the Inventor of a Patent
According to Reuters, the UK Supreme Court announced the judgment result on the 20th local time. A US computer scientist lost his case when he applied for a patent for an invention created by his artificial intelligence system. This means that under British patent law, the inventor of a patent must be a natural person, and artificial intelligence cannot become the inventor of a patent.
In this case, the US computer scientist applied for a patent for the artificial intelligence system he developed. However, the UK Supreme Court rejected his request because it stipulates in the British patent law that the inventor of a patent must be a natural person. This ruling sparked discussions about whether artificial intelligence should be considered a legal entity.
In recent years, with the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, more and more enterprises and individuals have begun to use artificial intelligence for innovation and research. However, in this process, how to protect the intellectual property rights generated by artificial intelligence has become an urgent problem to be solved. At present, different countries have different views on this issue. Some countries allow artificial intelligence to be the inventor of a patent application, while others insist that the inventor must be a natural person.
The ruling of the UK Supreme Court provides clear guidance for the country’s intellectual property protection policy. In the future, British enterprises and research institutions may need to pay more attention to the issue of intellectual property protection when developing and applying artificial intelligence technology. At the same time, this also provides reference for other countries dealing with similar issues.
【来源】https://www.ithome.com/0/740/657.htm
Views: 1