##33岁保安值夜班猝死，事发时曾在工作群求救，如何认定工亡？
近日，一则33岁保安值夜班猝死，事发时曾在工作群求救的消息引发社会关注。据悉，该保安在工作期间感到身体不适，并在工作群内向同事求助，但最终不幸离世。这一事件引发了公众对工亡认定和劳动者权益保障的讨论。
**事件回顾：**
据了解，该保安名叫王某，在某公司担任夜班保安。事发当晚，王某在工作群内表示自己身体不适，并向同事求助。但由于当时无人及时发现其异常情况，最终导致其不幸离世。
**法律解读：**
根据我国《工伤保险条例》，工伤认定需要满足以下条件：
1.**工作时间和工作场所内发生事故**：王某在值夜班期间猝死，符合该条件。
2. **因工作原因导致的伤害或疾病**：需要进一步调查王某的具体死因，以及其猝死与工作是否存在直接因果关系。
3. **符合工伤认定标准**：根据具体情况，需要判断是否符合工伤认定标准，例如是否属于突发疾病、是否属于职业病等。
**律师观点：**
**某律师事务所律师张律师**表示，本案的关键在于认定王某的猝死是否与工作存在直接因果关系。如果能够证明王某的猝死与工作强度、工作环境等因素存在直接联系，则可以认定为工亡。
**张律师**还指出，王某在工作群内求救的行为，可以作为其工作期间身体不适的佐证。此外，公司是否有及时采取措施进行救助，也是认定工亡的重要因素。
**专家建议：**
**某劳动法专家李教授**建议，企业应加强对员工的健康管理，定期进行体检，并建立完善的应急预案。同时，员工也应注意自身健康状况，及时向公司反映身体不适，避免类似事件发生。
**结语：**
33岁保安值夜班猝死事件，再次引发了社会对工亡认定和劳动者权益保障的关注。希望相关部门能够认真调查此事，依法认定工亡，并加强对劳动者权益的保护，避免类似悲剧再次发生。
英语如下：
##33-Year-Old Security Guard Dies on Night Shift, Raising QuestionsAbout Work-Related Death Recognition
**Keywords:** Security Guard Death, Work-Related Death Recognition, Legal Interpretation
**News Content:**
A recent incident involving the death of a 33-year-old security guard on night shifthas sparked public concern and debate regarding work-related death recognition and worker’s rights protection. The security guard, reportedly experiencing discomfort during his shift, had soughthelp from colleagues in the work group chat, but ultimately passed away.
**Event Recap:**
The security guard, identified as Wang, worked as a night shift security guard for a company. On the night of the incident, Wangexpressed discomfort in the work group chat and sought assistance from colleagues. However, no one noticed his condition in time, leading to his tragic death.
**Legal Interpretation:**
According to China’s “Work Injury Insurance Regulations,” work-related death recognition requires the following conditions:
1. **Accident occurring within work time and workplace:** Wang’s death during his night shift meets this condition.
2. **Injury or disease caused by work:** Further investigation is required to determine the specific cause of Wang’s death and whether there is a direct causalrelationship between his death and his work.
3. **Meeting work injury recognition standards:** Based on the specific circumstances, it needs to be determined whether the case meets work injury recognition standards, such as whether it constitutes a sudden illness or an occupational disease.
**Lawyer’s Perspective:**
**Lawyer Zhang from acertain law firm** stated that the key to this case lies in determining whether Wang’s death is directly related to his work. If it can be proven that Wang’s death is directly linked to work intensity, working environment, or other work-related factors, it can be recognized as a work-related death.
**Lawyer Zhang** also pointed out that Wang’s request for help in the work group chat can serve as evidence of his discomfort during work. Additionally, whether the company took timely measures to provide assistance is also a crucial factor in determining work-related death.
**Expert Recommendations:**
**Professor Li, anexpert in labor law,** recommends that companies strengthen employee health management, conduct regular health checkups, and establish comprehensive emergency response plans. At the same time, employees should pay attention to their own health conditions and promptly report any discomfort to the company to prevent similar incidents from happening.
**Conclusion:**
The death of the33-year-old security guard on night shift has once again brought to light the importance of work-related death recognition and worker’s rights protection. It is hoped that relevant authorities will thoroughly investigate this incident, determine work-related death according to law, and strengthen the protection of worker’s rights toprevent similar tragedies from occurring in the future.
【来源】https://www.zhihu.com/question/664609018
Views: 1