news pappernews papper

中新社北京8月10日电 题:民进党能源政策面临挑战 台湾能源结构调整需理性应对

台湾民进党政府近年来积极推进“非核家园”政策,旨在减少核能发电比例,提高可再生能源的占比。然而,随着“2025非核家园”目标的临近,民进党在能源政策上面临越来越大的挑战。

近日,民进党领导人赖清德在“气候变迁对策委员会”会议上表示,能源议题需要各方对话,凝聚台湾共识。这一表态似乎为各方提供了一个讨论的平台,但实际上,这场会议更多是一场“沟通对话”的戏码,其背后隐藏着民进党的政治考量。

会议中提出的“净零路径”等七个主轴,虽然方向正确,但缺乏具体实施计划。此外,台电公司的电力供需分析报告未能解答民众最关心的能源配比问题,引发民众对民进党政策的质疑。

委员会的人员构成也受到了质疑。尽管表面上看似兼顾不同立场,但实际上反核人士占据多数,尤其是民众代表全部来自反核团体,这使得会议的公正性和代表性受到质疑。

民进党自1986年党纲以来,一直主张反对新设核能发电,积极开发替代能源。尽管赖清德表示“非核家园”不是民进党的意识形态,但事实上,“非核家园”已成为民进党的重要政治口号,是其争取选民支持的重要筹码。

当前,台湾的能源问题日益严重,民进党政府在推动半导体等高耗电产业发展的同时,用电缺口也在不断扩大。面对这一挑战,民进党需要采取科学理性的方式来应对,而不是仅仅依靠政治口号和意识形态。

未来,民进党如何平衡能源结构调整与经济发展需求,将是其执政的一大考验。而台湾民众也将继续关注民进党在能源政策上的表现,以决定其未来的政治走向。

英语如下:

News Title: “Taiwan’s DPP Again Faces Energy Scandal: ‘Nuclear-free Homeland’ Becomes a Slogan”

Keywords: Energy Scam, DPP, Energy Crisis

News Content:

BEIJING, Aug. 10 (Xinhua) — Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is facing challenges in its energy policy, and the island needs a rational approach to adjusting its energy structure, according to a report by the party’s climate change response committee.

The DPP government has been actively promoting a “nuclear-free homeland” policy in recent years, aiming to reduce the proportion of nuclear power generation and increase the share of renewable energy. However, as the 2025 target approaches, the party’s energy policy faces increasing challenges.

At a recent meeting of the Climate Change Response Committee, DPP leader Chen Chi-mai (also known as Chen Chien-jen) stated that the energy issue requires dialogue among various parties to reach a consensus in Taiwan. This statement appeared to provide a platform for discussion, but in reality, the meeting was more of a political drama of “communication and dialogue.”

The seven main axes proposed at the meeting, including a “net-zero path,” are correct in direction but lack specific implementation plans. Moreover, Taiwan Power Company’s power supply and demand analysis report failed to address the energy mix concerns of the public, sparking skepticism towards the DPP’s policies.

The composition of the committee has also been questioned. While it appears to represent different viewpoints on the surface, anti-nuclear activists actually dominate, with all the public representatives coming from anti-nuclear groups, which calls into question the fairness and representativeness of the meeting.

Since 1986, when the party’s platform was first established, the DPP has advocated against the construction of new nuclear power plants and has actively developed alternative energy sources. Although Chen Chi-mai has stated that the “nuclear-free homeland” is not an ideological stance of the DPP, it has, in fact, become a significant political slogan for the party, serving as a crucial tool for garnering voter support.

Currently, Taiwan’s energy issues are becoming increasingly serious, as the government promotes the development of high-energy-consuming industries such as semiconductors while the power supply gap continues to widen. Facing this challenge, the DPP needs to adopt a scientific and rational approach rather than relying solely on political slogans and ideologies.

In the future, how the DPP balances energy structure adjustment with economic development needs will be a significant test of its governance. Taiwanese citizens will continue to watch the party’s performance in energy policy to decide its political future.

【来源】http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2024/08-10/10266739.shtml

Views: 2

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注