最高人民检察院近日发布了一系列典型案例，旨在彰显依法惩治利用网络暴力侵犯企业合法权益的坚定决心。这些案例涵盖了利用网络敲诈勒索企业、损害商业信誉以及寻衅滋事等罪名，旨在传递出对网络暴力伤企犯罪的强烈信号，坚决改变违法成本低、维权成本高的现象。
近年来，随着互联网的迅猛发展，一些不法分子利用公众平台散播涉企谣言，对企业进行敲诈勒索、损害商业信誉等犯罪活动，以网络暴力的方式牟取非法利益，严重侵害了企业的合法权益。对此，最高人民检察院联合最高人民法院、公安部共同出台了《关于依法惩治网络暴力违法犯罪的指导意见》，明确要求对网络暴力违法犯罪行为进行依法严惩，同时建立健全长效治理机制，从源头上减少网络暴力事件的发生，努力营造一个清朗的网络空间。
以李某某等人敲诈勒索案为例，该案件中，被告人李某某及其妻子刘某甲，通过在网购的零食包装内故意放置异物，伪造食品质量问题，以此作为威胁，迫使商家给予赔偿。若商家不同意赔偿，则通过在网上曝光或投诉的方式继续施压。该团伙先后对17家电商企业进行了206次敲诈，累计金额达17万元。其中，刘某乙作为帮助者，参与了部分犯罪活动，获利500元。案件由安徽省芜湖市公安局弋江分局立案侦查，最终，弋江区检察院对李某某、刘某甲提起公诉，而对未成年人刘某乙则作出相对不起诉处理。
在处理过程中，检察机关引导侦查，准确地认定犯罪性质，确保了案件的公正处理。同时，通过向被告人阐明法律依据和认罪认罚、退赔与否的量刑差异，促使被告人自愿认罪认罚，并全额退还了企业损失，有效挽回了企业的经济损失。此外，检察机关还考虑到刘某乙的未成年人身份、参与程度及悔罪表现，依法作出了不起诉处理。对于李某某，考虑到其家庭情况和刘某甲的积极态度，检察机关提出了宽缓量刑建议。
这些案例的发布，不仅展示了司法机关对网络暴力行为的严厉打击，也体现了在依法惩治犯罪的同时，注重保护未成年人权益、关注家庭困难的宽严相济原则。通过此类典型案例的发布，最高人民检察院旨在警示社会，对利用网络暴力侵犯企业合法权益的行为将采取零容忍态度，为营造更加公正、清朗的网络环境提供法律保障。
英语如下：
Title: Supreme People’s Procuratorate Releases Key Cases: Firmly Punishing Internet-Driven Corporate Injuries
Keywords: Internet Violence, Business Protection, Key Cases
Content: The Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) recently unveiled a series of landmark cases, signaling its firm resolve to combat the unlawful use of internet violence that infringes upon corporate rights. These cases encompass a range of offenses including cyber extortion, damage to business reputation, and provocation, aiming to strongly convey the stance against internet-driven corporate injuries and decisively address the issue of low legal costs and high costs for business protection.
With the rapid advancement of the internet, a few unscrupulous individuals have been exploiting public platforms to spread slanderous information against businesses, engaging in extortion, damage to business reputation, and other crimes through internet violence for illegal gains, severely compromising corporate rights. In response, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, in conjunction with the Supreme People’s Court and the Ministry of Public Security, issued a guideline on “Strategically Addressing Internet Violence Crime,” stipulating the need for stringent legal action against such crimes. It also emphasizes the establishment of a long-term governance mechanism to reduce the occurrence of internet violence and work towards a cleaner cyberspace.
Taking the case of Li某某 et al. as an example, Li某某, along with his wife RuiJia, carried out extortion by intentionally placing foreign objects in the packaging of purchased snacks to fabricate quality issues, then threatening the affected businesses with exposure or complaints unless they agreed to compensation. If the businesses refused, they continued to exert pressure through online actions. This group targeted 17 e-commerce companies, carrying out 206 extortion attempts with a total sum of 170,000 yuan. RuiEr, as an accomplice, was involved in some of the criminal activities and received 500 yuan in profit. The case was investigated by the Wuhu Public Security Bureau in Anhui Province, and the procuratorial organs of Yicheng District prosecuted Li某某 and RuiJia, while deciding not to prosecute RuiEr due to his juvenile status and limited involvement.
In the process, the procuratorial organs guided the investigation, accurately identified the crime, ensuring fair proceedings. They also informed the defendants of the legal basis, the distinctions in sentencing based on confession and compensation, encouraging them to voluntarily confess and plead guilty, and fully compensating the business losses. Additionally, considering RuiEr’s juvenile status, his level of involvement, and his remorse, the procuratorial organs decided not to prosecute him. Li某某, taking into account his family circumstances and RuiJia’s cooperative attitude, the procuratorial organs proposed a lenient sentencing recommendation.
The release of these cases not only demonstrates the judiciary’s determination to severely punish internet violence, but also embodies the principle of balancing justice and leniency, especially in protecting the rights of minors and addressing family difficulties. By publishing such key cases, the SPP aims to warn society that the unlawful use of internet violence to infringe upon corporate rights will be met with zero tolerance, providing legal assurance for the creation of a fairer and cleaner cyberspace.
【来源】http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2024/07-28/10258835.shtml
Views: 2