### 美国政坛近日震动，一名民主党众议员提出对联邦最高法院两位大法官——托马斯和阿利托的弹劾动议，这一举动被视作对司法独立性的重大挑战，甚至可能升级为一场宪法危机。
### 据美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）报道，当地时间7月10日，这位未具名的民主党议员在众议院提出这一动议，指控托马斯和阿利托在一系列关键案件中的裁决行为违反了法律精神和公众利益，其中包括最近备受争议的“美国诉卡斯特罗”案的裁决结果。
### 这一举动引发美国政界和法律界广泛关注，因为它触及了司法独立与政治干预之间的敏感平衡。议员们普遍担心，这一行动可能会引发对最高法院独立性的质疑，甚至导致公众对司法体系的信心下降。
### 尽管弹劾程序在最高法院内部并不适用，这一提案的提出仍然引发了广泛的讨论和辩论。法律专家指出，虽然弹劾程序通常用于国会成员或联邦官员，但这一提案试图通过暗示的后果影响最高法院的决策，这本身就是对传统司法独立原则的挑战。
### 目前，白宫和最高法院方面尚未对此事作出正式回应。然而，这一事件已迅速成为美国政治辩论的焦点，凸显了当前美国社会对最高法院角色和权力的广泛讨论和争议。
### 在接下来的日子里，这一提案的后续发展将受到密切关注，因为它不仅关乎两位大法官的职位安全，更可能引发关于美国司法体系未来走向的深刻讨论，甚至触及宪法精神的核心。美国政治和法律界普遍期待，这一事件能够促进更加深入的对话，旨在维护司法独立和公正，以及保障公民的基本权利和自由。
英语如下：
### Title: US Congressman Proposes Impeachment of Supreme Court Justices, Heightening Constitutional Crisis
### Keywords: Impeachment Proposal, Constitutional Crisis, Supreme Court
### An Upgrade to Constitutional Crisis: US Congressman Proposes Impeachment of Supreme Court Justices
### The political landscape in the United States has been shaken recently, as a Democratic congressman has tabled a proposal to impeach two Supreme Court justices, Thomas and Alito. This move is perceived as a significant challenge to the principle of judicial independence and could potentially escalate into a constitutional crisis.
### According to CNN, on July 10, an unnamed Democratic congressman in the House of Representatives presented this proposal, accusing the justices of making rulings in a series of critical cases that violate the spirit of the law and public interest, particularly in the controversial outcome of the “United States v. Castro” case.
### This action has garnered significant attention in the US political and legal circles, as it touches upon the delicate balance between judicial independence and political interference. Lawmakers are concerned that this action might undermine the Supreme Court’s independence, potentially leading to a decline in public confidence in the legal system.
### Although impeachment procedures are not applicable within the Supreme Court, the presentation of this proposal has sparked widespread discussion and debate. Legal experts note that while impeachment procedures are typically used for Congress members or federal officials, this proposal aims to influence the Supreme Court’s decisions by implying potential consequences, which challenges the traditional principles of judicial independence.
### As of now, the White House and the Supreme Court have not formally responded to this matter. However, the event has quickly become a focal point in US political debates, highlighting the broad discussions and controversies surrounding the role and powers of the Supreme Court in the current US society.
### In the days to come, the development of this proposal will be closely watched, not only because of the potential impact on the security of the two justices’ positions but also because it may trigger profound discussions about the future direction of the US judicial system, potentially touching on the core principles of the Constitution. The American political and legal circles are eagerly anticipating that this event will facilitate deeper dialogues aimed at preserving judicial independence and fairness, as well as safeguarding the basic rights and freedoms of citizens.
【来源】http://www.chinanews.com/gj/2024/07-11/10249393.shtml
Views: 3