据央视新闻消息,北京互联网法院于今天上午对全国首例“AI声音侵权案”进行一审宣判。法院认定,作为配音师的原告,其声音权益及于案涉AI声音。被告方使用原告声音、开发案涉AI文本转语音产品未获得合法授权,构成侵权。

法院要求被告方书面赔礼道歉,并赔偿原告各项损失25万元。这起案件引发了广泛关注,因为它涉及到AI技术在声音领域的应用与版权问题。

原告是一名专业的配音师,其声音被被告方未经授权地用于开发AI文本转语音产品。原告认为,其声音权益受到了侵犯,因此将被告方告上法庭。

法院在审理过程中认为,原告作为一名配音师,其声音具有独创性和辨识度,应被视为一种知识产权。被告方在使用原告声音时,未经其同意,且未支付相应的授权费用,构成了侵权行为。

这起案件的宣判,对于AI技术在声音领域的应用提出了新的要求。法院指出,在使用AI技术进行声音转换时,必须尊重原声音者的权益,获得其合法授权,并支付相应的费用。

这起案件也引发了对于AI技术应用的广泛讨论。有人认为,AI技术的应用正在日益渗透到各个领域,如何保护知识产权,如何规范AI技术的发展,将成为未来社会面临的重要问题。

这起案件的宣判,对于保护配音师的权益,规范AI技术的发展,具有重要的示范意义。

英语如下:

**Headline:** “Voice Artist Wins Case! First AI Voice Infringement Case Announced, Awarded 2.5 Million”

Keywords: AI voice infringement, first case verdict, voice artist wins compensation.

**News Content:**

# First AI Voice Infringement Case Verdict: Voice Artist Awarded 2.5 Million

According to CCTV News, the Beijing Internet Court announced the verdict of the first “AI Voice Infringement Case” this morning. The court ruled that the plaintiff, a professional voice artist, has rights to his voice, including the infringed AI voice. The defendant, who used the plaintiff’s voice to develop an AI text-to-speech product without legal authorization, was found to have committed infringement.

The court ordered the defendant to make a written apology and compensate the plaintiff for losses amounting to 2.5 million. This case has drawn widespread attention as it involves the application of AI technology in the voice field and copyright issues.

The plaintiff is a professional voice artist whose voice was used by the defendant without authorization for AI text-to-speech development. The plaintiff alleged his voice rights were infringed and sued the defendant.

During the trial, the court held that the plaintiff, as a professional voice artist, possesses originality and recognition in his voice, which should be considered as intellectual property. The defendant’s use of the plaintiff’s voice without consent and without payment of authorized fees constituted an infringing act.

The verdict of this case sets a new precedent for the application of AI technology in the voice field. The court pointed out that when using AI technology for voice conversion, one must respect the rights of the original voice actor, obtain legal authorization, and pay corresponding fees.

This case has also sparked a broader discussion on the application of AI technology. Some argue that as AI technology increasingly infiltrates various fields, how to protect intellectual property and how to regulate the development of AI technology will become important issues facing future societies.

The announcement of this case has significant示范意义 for protecting voice artists’ rights and regulating the development of AI technology.

Translated into English, the news summary would be formatted as follows:

“`markdown
# Voice Artist Wins Landmark Case: First AI Voice Infringement Verdict Announced, Awarded 2.5 Million

**Key Points:**
– First AI voice infringement case in China concludes with a verdict.
– Plaintiff, a professional voice artist, wins compensation of 2.5 million yuan.
– Case highlights the importance of respecting voice rights in AI technology applications.

**Case Details:**
The Beijing Internet Court ruled today in favor of a professional voice artist, marking the first verdict in a case involving AI voice infringement. The court recognized the plaintiff’s voice rights, which were infringed upon by the defendant’s use of the artist’s voice without permission in an AI text-to-speech product. The defendant was ordered to apologize in writing and compensate the plaintiff for losses totaling 2.5 million yuan.

This case has sparked widespread debate about the application of AI technology, particularly in the voice sector. It raises crucial questions about protecting intellectual property and the ethical use of AI.

The verdict serves as a precedent for safeguarding voice artists’ rights and regulating the expansion of AI technology.
“`

This English-formatted summary encapsulates the user’s provided news content in a structured and suitable markdown style for presentation or documentation purposes.

【来源】https://www.ithome.com/0/763/589.htm

Views: 2

发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注