**漫评美炮制“中国产能过剩论”：双重标准的新例子**
近日，美方政客再次挑起事端，炒作“中国产能过剩冲击世界市场”的话题。这一论调看似新颖，实则老调重弹，背后透露出的是美国某些人士的“双重标准”。
首先，产能过剩是一个全球性问题，而非中国特有。美国自身在多个行业也有产能过剩的问题，例如农业。美国通过大量的农业补贴和价格支持，使得其农产品在全球市场占据优势地位，对其他国家的农业产生了巨大冲击。这种做法与美方指责中国的产能过剩如出一辙，都是通过政策手段推动国内产业发展，并在全球范围内产生影响。
其次，中国的产能过剩问题并非没有解决方案。中国政府已经意识到这一问题，并正在采取措施进行调整。例如，中国正在推动产业结构的优化升级，发展高技术产业，减少对传统产业的依赖。同时，中国也在加强环保措施，对过剩产能进行淘汰，以减少对环境的破坏。
最后，美国在指责中国的产能过剩时，似乎忘记了自身在全球经济中的角色。美国作为全球最大的消费市场，对全球产能的波动有着巨大的影响。美国在享受全球产能带来的好处的同时，却试图将产能过剩的问题归咎于中国，这种“双重标准”的做法显然是不公平的。
总的来说，美国炮制“中国产能过剩论”实质上是出于保护主义目的，试图通过打压中国的制造业优势来维护自身的利益。这种做法不仅不利于全球经济的健康发展，也会损害美国自身的利益。希望美方能够摒弃“双重标准”，以公平、公正的态度看待和处理全球经济中的问题。
英语如下：
**Headline: “US Again Stirring Up China’s Overcapacity Issue, International Media Criticizes ‘Double Standard’ Behavior”**
Keywords: US Politicians, China’s Overcapacity, Double Standard Accusation.
**Commentary: A New Example of “Double Standard” in the US Campaign against “China’s Overcapacity”**
Recently, US politicians have once again created tensions by hyping the topic of “China’s overcapacity impacting the global market”. This argument seems new, but it is actually a recycled old tune, revealing the “double standard” of certain Americans.
Firstly, overcapacity is a global issue, not unique to China. The US itself also faces overcapacity problems in multiple industries, such as agriculture. The US maintains a dominant position in the global market through extensive agricultural subsidies and price supports, significantly impacting other countries’ agriculture. This practice is no different from the US accusing China of overcapacity, both using policy means to promote domestic industries and affecting the global market.
Secondly, the issue of China’s overcapacity does have solutions. The Chinese government has recognized this problem and is taking measures to adjust. For instance, China is promoting the optimization and upgrading of its industrial structure, developing high-tech industries, and reducing dependence on traditional industries. At the same time, China is also strengthening environmental protection measures, eliminating excess capacity to reduce environmental damage.
Lastly, when the US accuses China of overcapacity, it seems to forget its own role in the global economy. As the largest consumer market in the world, the US has a significant impact on global capacity fluctuations. While enjoying the benefits of global capacity, the US attempts to blame China for overcapacity issues, which is clearly an unfair “double standard” approach.
In summary, the US campaign against “China’s overcapacity” is essentially protectionist, aiming to undermine China’s manufacturing advantage to protect its own interests. This practice is not only detrimental to the healthy development of the global economy but could also harm US interests. It is hoped that the US can abandon its “double standard” and approach global economic issues with fairness and justice.
【来源】http://www.chinanews.com/gj/2024/05-16/10217650.shtml
Views: 2