news pappernews papper

备受关注的“农妇卖150份粉蒸肉被判赔5万”一案近日有了新的进展。据澎湃新闻报道,2024年1月11日,重庆市高院作出民事裁定,准许原告邵佰春撤诉,同时撤销原一审和二审判决。此前,农妇因售卖自制粉蒸肉被诉侵权,引发社会广泛关注。

案件起源于一起食品安全纠纷,原告邵佰春认为被告王亚琼销售的粉蒸肉不符合食品安全标准,导致其食用后身体不适。一审法院判决王亚琼赔偿5万元,二审法院维持原判。然而,这一判决引起了公众的广泛争议,许多人认为判决过重,对农妇不公平。

在二审结束后,原告邵佰春提出撤诉申请,经过法院审查,重庆市高院最终作出民事裁定,允许邵佰春撤诉,并撤销原一审和二审判决。这意味着农妇王亚琼无需再承担赔偿责任。

此次裁定的作出,体现了法院对案件事实和法律的审慎审查,以及对当事人权益的尊重。尽管食品安全问题依然值得关注,但在这个特定案例中,法院审理结果得到了一定程度的纠正。这一事件再次引发人们对司法公正、权益保护等问题的思考。

Title: High Court Rulings on “Farmers Selling 150 Pieces of Steamed Pork” Case: Withdrawal of Lawsuit and Revocation of Original Verdicts

Keywords: Farmers, Steamed Pork, Withdrawal of Lawsuit, Revocation of Verdicts

News Content: The much-publicized case of a farmer being sued for selling 150 pieces of homemade steamed pork has recently seen new developments. According to a report from The Paper, the Chongqing High Court made a civil ruling allowing the plaintiff, Shao Baichun, to withdraw her lawsuit and revoked the original first- and second-instance judgments. The case originated from a food safety dispute, in which Shao sued the defendant, Wang Yajiong, for selling steamed pork that did not meet food safety standards, resulting in illness after consumption. The original judgment ordered Wang to compensate Shao with 50,000 yuan.

The appeal was filed after the first-instance judgment, and the second-instance court upheld the original ruling. However, the sentence sparked widespread public controversy, with many believing it to be excessive and unfair to the farmer.

After the second-instance trial, the plaintiff Shao submitted a withdrawal application, which was reviewed by the court. The Chongqing High Court ultimately ruled to allow Shao’s withdrawal and revoke the original judgments. This means that Wang Yajiong is no longer required to bear any compensation liabilities.

The ruling reflects the court’s cautious review of the facts and law, as well as respect for the parties’ rights. Although food safety issues remain值得关注,但在这个特定案例中,法院审理结果得到了一定程度的纠正。这一事件再次引发人们对司法公正、权益保护等问题的思考。

【来源】https://www.zhihu.com/question/639164632

Views: 1

发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注