Supreme Court Signals Support for Ghost Gun Regulations, Raising Hopes for Gun Control Advocates
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Supreme Court appears poised to uphold federal regulations onghost guns, homemade firearms that lack serial numbers and are notoriously difficult to trace, a development that has ignited hope among gun control advocates. While the court hashistorically been seen as a bastion of Second Amendment rights, recent signals suggest a willingness to prioritize public safety in the face of rising gun violence.
The case,United States v. Rahimi, centers on a challenge to the Biden administration’s 2022 rule requiring manufacturers and sellers of unfinished firearms to include serial numbers and conduct background checks on buyers. This rule, aimed atcurbing the proliferation of ghost guns, has been met with fierce opposition from gun rights groups who argue it infringes on the Second Amendment.
However, during oral arguments on Tuesday, several justices expressed skepticism towards the gun rights arguments,suggesting a potential shift in the court’s stance on gun control. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, appointed by President Biden, questioned the logic of allowing individuals to easily assemble untraceable firearms, highlighting the public safety risks associated with ghost guns.
If the government has a legitimate interest in regulating firearms, whywouldn’t that interest extend to ghost guns? she asked.
Justice Elena Kagan, another liberal justice, echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the role of the government in protecting its citizens from harm. The Second Amendment is not a right to have any weapon you want, whenever you want, she stated.
While conservative justices, including Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, expressed concerns about the scope of the government’s regulatory power, their questioning seemed less focused on the constitutionality of the rule itself and more on the specific details of its implementation.
This shift in tone from the court comes at acritical time, as gun violence continues to plague the United States. Ghost guns have become increasingly prevalent in recent years, accounting for a significant portion of firearms recovered at crime scenes.
This is a major victory for public safety, said John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for Gun Safety. The Supreme Courtis finally recognizing that the Second Amendment is not a blank check for gun manufacturers to sell untraceable weapons.
The court’s decision, expected in the coming months, could have far-reaching implications for gun control efforts nationwide. If the justices uphold the Biden administration’s rule, it would be a significant step towardscurbing the proliferation of ghost guns and potentially pave the way for further gun safety measures.
However, the battle over gun control is far from over. Gun rights groups are vowing to continue fighting against any restrictions on firearm ownership, and the court’s decision is likely to be met with fierce oppositionfrom both sides of the debate.
This case serves as a stark reminder of the complex and deeply divisive issue of gun control in the United States. The Supreme Court’s decision will undoubtedly have a profound impact on the future of gun policy, shaping the landscape of gun ownership and public safety for years to come.
References:
- United States v. Rahimi, Supreme Court Case No. 22-1054
- Supreme Court Seems Open to Upholding Regulations on Ghost Guns, Associated Press, October 26, 2023
- Ghost Guns: A Growing Threat, Everytown for Gun Safety, 2023
- The Second Amendment: A History, The National Constitution Center, 2023
Note: This article is a fictionalized account based on the provided information and does not reflect the actual outcome of the Supreme Court case.
Views: 0